@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ static void msm_config_port(struct uart_port *port, int flags)
if (ret)
return;
}
- if (msm_port->is_uartdm)
+ if (msm_port->gsbi_base)
writel_relaxed(GSBI_PROTOCOL_UART,
msm_port->gsbi_base + GSBI_CONTROL);
}
@@ -860,6 +860,11 @@ static struct uart_driver msm_uart_driver = {
static atomic_t msm_uart_next_id = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
+static const struct of_device_id msm_uartdm_table[] = {
+ { .compatible = "qcom,msm-uartdm" },
+ { }
+};
+
static int __init msm_serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct msm_port *msm_port;
@@ -879,7 +884,7 @@ static int __init msm_serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
port->dev = &pdev->dev;
msm_port = UART_TO_MSM(port);
- if (platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1))
+ if (of_match_device(msm_uartdm_table, &pdev->dev))
msm_port->is_uartdm = 1;
else
msm_port->is_uartdm = 0;
@@ -926,6 +931,7 @@ static int msm_serial_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
static struct of_device_id msm_match_table[] = {
{ .compatible = "qcom,msm-uart" },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,msm-uartdm" },
{}
};
Not all UARTDM hardware is part of a GSBI complex. Add support for these devices and fix a bug where we assumed uartdm meant the hardware was part of a GSBI complex. Cc: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> --- drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)