| Message ID | 1406250448-470-6-git-send-email-skannan@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 25 July 2014 06:37, Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> wrote: > @@ -1142,31 +1124,11 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif) > > /* If we get this far, this is the first time we are adding the > * policy */ We don't need this comment as well.. > - recover_policy = false; > - > - /* > - * Restore the saved policy when doing light-weight init and fall back > - * to the full init if that fails. > - */ > - policy = recover_policy ? cpufreq_policy_restore(cpu) : NULL; > - if (!policy) { > - recover_policy = false; > - policy = cpufreq_policy_alloc(); > - if (!policy) > - goto nomem_out; > - } > - > - /* > - * In the resume path, since we restore a saved policy, the assignment > - * to policy->cpu is like an update of the existing policy, rather than > - * the creation of a brand new one. So we need to perform this update > - * by invoking update_policy_cpu(). > - */ > - if (recover_policy && cpu != policy->cpu) > - update_policy_cpu(policy, cpu); Since we don't do this anymore, what will happen to policy->cpu after all CPUs of a policy are hotplugged-out and then brought back in? > - else > - policy->cpu = cpu; > + policy = cpufreq_policy_alloc(); > + if (!policy) > + goto nomem_out; > > + policy->cpu = cpu; > cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, cpumask_of(cpu)); > > init_completion(&policy->kobj_unregister); > @@ -1190,10 +1152,8 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif) > */ > cpumask_and(policy->cpus, policy->cpus, cpu_online_mask); > > - if (!recover_policy) { > - policy->user_policy.min = policy->min; > - policy->user_policy.max = policy->max; > - } > + policy->user_policy.min = policy->min; > + policy->user_policy.max = policy->max; > > down_write(&policy->rwsem); > write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); > @@ -1252,13 +1212,11 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif) > blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list, > CPUFREQ_START, policy); > > - if (!recover_policy) { > - ret = cpufreq_add_dev_interface(policy, dev); > - if (ret) > - goto err_out_unregister; > - blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list, > - CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY, policy); > - } > + ret = cpufreq_add_dev_interface(policy, dev); > + if (ret) > + goto err_out_unregister; > + blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list, > + CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY, policy); > > write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); > list_add(&policy->policy_list, &cpufreq_policy_list); > @@ -1266,10 +1224,8 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif) > > cpufreq_init_policy(policy); > > - if (!recover_policy) { > - policy->user_policy.policy = policy->policy; > - policy->user_policy.governor = policy->governor; > - } > + policy->user_policy.policy = policy->policy; > + policy->user_policy.governor = policy->governor; > up_write(&policy->rwsem); > > kobject_uevent(&policy->kobj, KOBJ_ADD); > @@ -1289,13 +1245,7 @@ err_get_freq: > if (cpufreq_driver->exit) > cpufreq_driver->exit(policy); > err_set_policy_cpu: > - if (recover_policy) { > - /* Do not leave stale fallback data behind. */ > - per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data_fallback, cpu) = NULL; > - cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(policy); > - } > cpufreq_policy_free(policy); > - > nomem_out: > up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem); > > @@ -1442,8 +1392,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev, > } > } > > - if (!cpufreq_suspended) > - cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(policy); > + cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(policy); Sure? This will free kobject. > /* > * Perform the ->exit() even during light-weight tear-down, > @@ -1458,8 +1407,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev, > list_del(&policy->policy_list); > write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); > > - if (!cpufreq_suspended) > - cpufreq_policy_free(policy); > + cpufreq_policy_free(policy); Same here. > } > > per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu) = NULL; > -- > 1.8.2.1 > > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, > hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 97edf05..b635e0e 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ */ static struct cpufreq_driver *cpufreq_driver; static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpufreq_policy *, cpufreq_cpu_data); -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpufreq_policy *, cpufreq_cpu_data_fallback); static DEFINE_RWLOCK(cpufreq_driver_lock); DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_governor_lock); static LIST_HEAD(cpufreq_policy_list); @@ -1006,22 +1005,6 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, } #endif -static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_restore(unsigned int cpu) -{ - struct cpufreq_policy *policy; - unsigned long flags; - - read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); - - policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data_fallback, cpu); - - read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); - - policy->governor = NULL; - - return policy; -} - static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(void) { struct cpufreq_policy *policy; @@ -1104,7 +1087,6 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif) int ret = -ENOMEM; struct cpufreq_policy *policy; unsigned long flags; - bool recover_policy = cpufreq_suspended; pr_debug("adding CPU %u\n", cpu); @@ -1142,31 +1124,11 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif) /* If we get this far, this is the first time we are adding the * policy */ - recover_policy = false; - - /* - * Restore the saved policy when doing light-weight init and fall back - * to the full init if that fails. - */ - policy = recover_policy ? cpufreq_policy_restore(cpu) : NULL; - if (!policy) { - recover_policy = false; - policy = cpufreq_policy_alloc(); - if (!policy) - goto nomem_out; - } - - /* - * In the resume path, since we restore a saved policy, the assignment - * to policy->cpu is like an update of the existing policy, rather than - * the creation of a brand new one. So we need to perform this update - * by invoking update_policy_cpu(). - */ - if (recover_policy && cpu != policy->cpu) - update_policy_cpu(policy, cpu); - else - policy->cpu = cpu; + policy = cpufreq_policy_alloc(); + if (!policy) + goto nomem_out; + policy->cpu = cpu; cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, cpumask_of(cpu)); init_completion(&policy->kobj_unregister); @@ -1190,10 +1152,8 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif) */ cpumask_and(policy->cpus, policy->cpus, cpu_online_mask); - if (!recover_policy) { - policy->user_policy.min = policy->min; - policy->user_policy.max = policy->max; - } + policy->user_policy.min = policy->min; + policy->user_policy.max = policy->max; down_write(&policy->rwsem); write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); @@ -1252,13 +1212,11 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif) blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list, CPUFREQ_START, policy); - if (!recover_policy) { - ret = cpufreq_add_dev_interface(policy, dev); - if (ret) - goto err_out_unregister; - blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list, - CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY, policy); - } + ret = cpufreq_add_dev_interface(policy, dev); + if (ret) + goto err_out_unregister; + blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list, + CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY, policy); write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); list_add(&policy->policy_list, &cpufreq_policy_list); @@ -1266,10 +1224,8 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif) cpufreq_init_policy(policy); - if (!recover_policy) { - policy->user_policy.policy = policy->policy; - policy->user_policy.governor = policy->governor; - } + policy->user_policy.policy = policy->policy; + policy->user_policy.governor = policy->governor; up_write(&policy->rwsem); kobject_uevent(&policy->kobj, KOBJ_ADD); @@ -1289,13 +1245,7 @@ err_get_freq: if (cpufreq_driver->exit) cpufreq_driver->exit(policy); err_set_policy_cpu: - if (recover_policy) { - /* Do not leave stale fallback data behind. */ - per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data_fallback, cpu) = NULL; - cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(policy); - } cpufreq_policy_free(policy); - nomem_out: up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem); @@ -1442,8 +1392,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev, } } - if (!cpufreq_suspended) - cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(policy); + cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(policy); /* * Perform the ->exit() even during light-weight tear-down, @@ -1458,8 +1407,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev, list_del(&policy->policy_list); write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); - if (!cpufreq_suspended) - cpufreq_policy_free(policy); + cpufreq_policy_free(policy); } per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu) = NULL;
Since we no longer destroy/realloc policy during logical hotplug, most of the policy save/restore code is dead code that doesn't get executed. Remove those. Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 82 +++++++++-------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)