| Message ID | 1454347680-10307-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | RFC |
| Delegated to: | Andy Gross |
| Headers | show |
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 09:27:59AM -0800, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c > b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c > index 4aeb8e1..a6dce1b 100644 > --- a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c > +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c > @@ -439,39 +439,6 @@ static irqreturn_t lpass_platform_lpaif_irq(int irq, > void *data) > return IRQ_HANDLED; > } > > -static int lpass_platform_alloc_buffer(struct snd_pcm_substream > *substream, > - struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rt) > -{ > - struct snd_dma_buffer *buf = &substream->dma_buffer; > - size_t size = lpass_platform_pcm_hardware.buffer_bytes_max; > - > - buf->dev.type = SNDRV_DMA_TYPE_DEV; > - buf->dev.dev = rt->platform->dev; > - buf->private_data = NULL; > - buf->area = dma_alloc_coherent(rt->platform->dev, size, > &buf->addr, > - GFP_KERNEL); > - if (!buf->area) { > - dev_err(rt->platform->dev, "%s: Could not allocate DMA > buffer\n", > - __func__); > - return -ENOMEM; > - } ... > @@ -499,7 +467,8 @@ static int lpass_platform_pcm_new(struct > snd_soc_pcm_runtime *soc_runtime) > > snd_soc_pcm_set_drvdata(soc_runtime, data); > > - ret = lpass_platform_alloc_buffer(substream, soc_runtime); > + ret = snd_dma_alloc_pages(SNDRV_DMA_TYPE_DEV, pcm->card->dev, > + size, &substream->dma_buffer); > if (ret) > return ret; > Is there a particular reason for using the soundcard device (pcm-card->dev) rather than the platform device (rt->platform->dev) for memory allocation? Especially considering you posted a fix for this several weeks ago (ASoC: qcom: use correct device pointer in dma allocation).
On 03/02/16 00:35, Kenneth Westfield wrote: > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 09:27:59AM -0800, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: >> diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c >> b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c >> index 4aeb8e1..a6dce1b 100644 >> --- a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c >> +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c >> @@ -439,39 +439,6 @@ static irqreturn_t lpass_platform_lpaif_irq(int irq, >> void *data) >> return IRQ_HANDLED; >> } >> >> -static int lpass_platform_alloc_buffer(struct snd_pcm_substream >> *substream, >> - struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rt) >> -{ >> - struct snd_dma_buffer *buf = &substream->dma_buffer; >> - size_t size = lpass_platform_pcm_hardware.buffer_bytes_max; >> - >> - buf->dev.type = SNDRV_DMA_TYPE_DEV; >> - buf->dev.dev = rt->platform->dev; >> - buf->private_data = NULL; >> - buf->area = dma_alloc_coherent(rt->platform->dev, size, >> &buf->addr, >> - GFP_KERNEL); >> - if (!buf->area) { >> - dev_err(rt->platform->dev, "%s: Could not allocate DMA >> buffer\n", >> - __func__); >> - return -ENOMEM; >> - } > > ... > >> @@ -499,7 +467,8 @@ static int lpass_platform_pcm_new(struct >> snd_soc_pcm_runtime *soc_runtime) >> >> snd_soc_pcm_set_drvdata(soc_runtime, data); >> >> - ret = lpass_platform_alloc_buffer(substream, soc_runtime); >> + ret = snd_dma_alloc_pages(SNDRV_DMA_TYPE_DEV, pcm->card->dev, >> + size, &substream->dma_buffer); >> if (ret) >> return ret; >> > > Is there a particular reason for using the soundcard device (pcm-card->dev) > rather than the platform device (rt->platform->dev) for memory > allocation? Especially considering you posted a fix for this several > weeks ago (ASoC: qcom: use correct device pointer in dma allocation). Thanks for spotting this, I will fix it and resend it with platform->dev. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c index 4aeb8e1..a6dce1b 100644 --- a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c @@ -439,39 +439,6 @@ static irqreturn_t lpass_platform_lpaif_irq(int irq, void *data) return IRQ_HANDLED; } -static int lpass_platform_alloc_buffer(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, - struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rt) -{ - struct snd_dma_buffer *buf = &substream->dma_buffer; - size_t size = lpass_platform_pcm_hardware.buffer_bytes_max; - - buf->dev.type = SNDRV_DMA_TYPE_DEV; - buf->dev.dev = rt->platform->dev; - buf->private_data = NULL; - buf->area = dma_alloc_coherent(rt->platform->dev, size, &buf->addr, - GFP_KERNEL); - if (!buf->area) { - dev_err(rt->platform->dev, "%s: Could not allocate DMA buffer\n", - __func__); - return -ENOMEM; - } - buf->bytes = size; - - return 0; -} - -static void lpass_platform_free_buffer(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, - struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rt) -{ - struct snd_dma_buffer *buf = &substream->dma_buffer; - - if (buf->area) { - dma_free_coherent(rt->dev, buf->bytes, buf->area, - buf->addr); - } - buf->area = NULL; -} - static int lpass_platform_pcm_new(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *soc_runtime) { struct snd_pcm *pcm = soc_runtime->pcm; @@ -483,6 +450,7 @@ static int lpass_platform_pcm_new(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *soc_runtime) struct lpass_variant *v = drvdata->variant; int ret; struct lpass_pcm_data *data; + size_t size = lpass_platform_pcm_hardware.buffer_bytes_max; data = devm_kzalloc(soc_runtime->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL); if (!data) @@ -499,7 +467,8 @@ static int lpass_platform_pcm_new(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *soc_runtime) snd_soc_pcm_set_drvdata(soc_runtime, data); - ret = lpass_platform_alloc_buffer(substream, soc_runtime); + ret = snd_dma_alloc_pages(SNDRV_DMA_TYPE_DEV, pcm->card->dev, + size, &substream->dma_buffer); if (ret) return ret; @@ -514,7 +483,7 @@ static int lpass_platform_pcm_new(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *soc_runtime) return 0; err_buf: - lpass_platform_free_buffer(substream, soc_runtime); + snd_dma_free_pages(&substream->dma_buffer); return ret; } @@ -533,7 +502,7 @@ static void lpass_platform_pcm_free(struct snd_pcm *pcm) if (v->free_dma_channel) v->free_dma_channel(drvdata, data->rdma_ch); - lpass_platform_free_buffer(substream, soc_runtime); + snd_dma_free_pages(&substream->dma_buffer); } static struct snd_soc_platform_driver lpass_platform_driver = {
There is no point in having local allocation functions when the driver can use snd_dma_alloc/free() apis. This patch replaces the local versions of the dma allocation apis with the snd_dma_alloc/free() apis. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> --- sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c | 41 +++++------------------------------------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)