| Message ID | 1525350041-22995-3-git-send-email-absahu@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded, archived |
| Delegated to: | Andy Gross |
| Headers | show |
Hi Abhishek, On Thu, 3 May 2018 17:50:29 +0530, Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org> wrote: > Now, the NAND base layer has helper function for ecc > parameters setup which does the same thing. Even if this message has a meaning in the series, I would prefer something more generic like: "Use the NAND core helper function xxx() to tune the ECC parameters instead of the function locally defined." With this change: Acked-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Thanks, Miquèl -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 2018-05-21 20:00, Miquel Raynal wrote: > Hi Abhishek, > > On Thu, 3 May 2018 17:50:29 +0530, Abhishek Sahu > <absahu@codeaurora.org> wrote: > >> Now, the NAND base layer has helper function for ecc >> parameters setup which does the same thing. > > Even if this message has a meaning in the series, I would prefer > something more generic like: > > "Use the NAND core helper function xxx() to tune the ECC parameters > instead of the function locally defined." > Sure Miquel. I will change the commit message. Thanks, Abhishek > With this change: > > Acked-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> > > Thanks, > Miquèl -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c index 2a302a1..d75f4e5 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c @@ -1120,33 +1120,6 @@ int denali_calc_ecc_bytes(int step_size, int strength) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(denali_calc_ecc_bytes); -static int denali_ecc_setup(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip, - struct denali_nand_info *denali) -{ - int oobavail = mtd->oobsize - denali->oob_skip_bytes; - int ret; - - /* - * If .size and .strength are already set (usually by DT), - * check if they are supported by this controller. - */ - if (chip->ecc.size && chip->ecc.strength) - return nand_check_ecc_caps(chip, denali->ecc_caps, oobavail); - - /* - * We want .size and .strength closest to the chip's requirement - * unless NAND_ECC_MAXIMIZE is requested. - */ - if (!(chip->ecc.options & NAND_ECC_MAXIMIZE)) { - ret = nand_match_ecc_req(chip, denali->ecc_caps, oobavail); - if (!ret) - return 0; - } - - /* Max ECC strength is the last thing we can do */ - return nand_maximize_ecc(chip, denali->ecc_caps, oobavail); -} - static int denali_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section, struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion) { @@ -1317,7 +1290,8 @@ int denali_init(struct denali_nand_info *denali) chip->ecc.mode = NAND_ECC_HW_SYNDROME; chip->options |= NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE; - ret = denali_ecc_setup(mtd, chip, denali); + ret = nand_ecc_param_setup(chip, denali->ecc_caps, + mtd->oobsize - denali->oob_skip_bytes); if (ret) { dev_err(denali->dev, "Failed to setup ECC settings.\n"); goto disable_irq;
Now, the NAND base layer has helper function for ecc parameters setup which does the same thing. CC: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org> --- * Changes from v1: NEW PATCH drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c | 30 ++---------------------------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)