Message ID | 1627627573-32454-3-git-send-email-rnayak@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show |
Series | nvmem: qfprom: Add binding updates and power-domain handling | expand |
Hi, On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 11:46 PM Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> wrote: > > qfprom_disable_fuse_blowing() disables a bunch of resources, > and then does a few register writes in the 'conf' address > space. > It works perhaps because the resources are needed only for the > 'raw' register space writes, and that the 'conf' space allows > read/writes regardless. > However that makes the code look confusing, so just move the > register writes before turning off the resources in the > function. > > Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> > --- > drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c > index 81fbad5..b0ca4c6 100644 > --- a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c > +++ b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c > @@ -139,6 +139,9 @@ static void qfprom_disable_fuse_blowing(const struct qfprom_priv *priv, > { > int ret; > > + writel(old->timer_val, priv->qfpconf + QFPROM_BLOW_TIMER_OFFSET); > + writel(old->accel_val, priv->qfpconf + QFPROM_ACCEL_OFFSET); > + > /* > * This may be a shared rail and may be able to run at a lower rate > * when we're not blowing fuses. At the moment, the regulator framework > @@ -159,9 +162,6 @@ static void qfprom_disable_fuse_blowing(const struct qfprom_priv *priv, > "Failed to set clock rate for disable (ignoring)\n"); > > clk_disable_unprepare(priv->secclk); > - > - writel(old->timer_val, priv->qfpconf + QFPROM_BLOW_TIMER_OFFSET); > - writel(old->accel_val, priv->qfpconf + QFPROM_ACCEL_OFFSET); > } I think it doesn't matter since all of these resources are just needed for burning fuses, but I agree that what you have here makes more logical sense and makes the function less confusing. Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c index 81fbad5..b0ca4c6 100644 --- a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c +++ b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c @@ -139,6 +139,9 @@ static void qfprom_disable_fuse_blowing(const struct qfprom_priv *priv, { int ret; + writel(old->timer_val, priv->qfpconf + QFPROM_BLOW_TIMER_OFFSET); + writel(old->accel_val, priv->qfpconf + QFPROM_ACCEL_OFFSET); + /* * This may be a shared rail and may be able to run at a lower rate * when we're not blowing fuses. At the moment, the regulator framework @@ -159,9 +162,6 @@ static void qfprom_disable_fuse_blowing(const struct qfprom_priv *priv, "Failed to set clock rate for disable (ignoring)\n"); clk_disable_unprepare(priv->secclk); - - writel(old->timer_val, priv->qfpconf + QFPROM_BLOW_TIMER_OFFSET); - writel(old->accel_val, priv->qfpconf + QFPROM_ACCEL_OFFSET); } /**
qfprom_disable_fuse_blowing() disables a bunch of resources, and then does a few register writes in the 'conf' address space. It works perhaps because the resources are needed only for the 'raw' register space writes, and that the 'conf' space allows read/writes regardless. However that makes the code look confusing, so just move the register writes before turning off the resources in the function. Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> --- drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)