Message ID | 20181217100724.4593-4-sibis@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2,1/7] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: Add remote-pid binding for GLINK SMEM | expand |
Hi, On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 2:08 AM Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org> wrote: > > Add power-domain bindings for Q6V5 MSS on MSM8996 and SDM845 SoCs. > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org> > --- > > v2: > * Add load_state power-domain > * List cx and mx power-domains for MSM8996 > > .../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt > index 98894e6ad456..50695cd86397 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt > @@ -80,6 +80,22 @@ on the Qualcomm Hexagon core. > reference to the pll-supply regulator to be held on behalf > of the booting of the Hexagon core on MSM8996 SoCs > > +- power-domains: > + Usage: required > + Value type: <phandle> > + Definition: reference to the list of 2 power-domains for the modem > + sub-system on MSM8996 SoCs This is truly required for msm8996 SoCs? The code I'm looking at doesn't try to get these power domains for 8996 so presumably you're breaking backward compatibility with old device tree files by making this required now. I don't personally know how widespread msm8996 usage is w/ upstream, so I'd let Bjorn comment on whether he thinks this is OK. As with the other patches in this series, I personally prefer less prose and more lists / tables of exactly what is required for which compatible string. > + reference to the list of 4 power-domains for the modem > + sub-system on SDM845 SoCs > + > +- power-domain-names: > + Usage: required > + Value type: <stringlist> > + Definition: must be "cx", "mx" for the modem sub-system on MSM8996 > + SoCs > + must be "cx", "mx", "mss", "load_state" for the modem > + sub-system on SDM845 SoCs I haven't see a patch for using "load_state". Can you point at it? I guess this was "aop" in your last version? -Doug
Hi Doug, Thanks for the review :) On 2018-12-18 05:31, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 2:08 AM Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org> > wrote: >> >> Add power-domain bindings for Q6V5 MSS on MSM8996 and SDM845 SoCs. >> >> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> >> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org> >> --- >> >> v2: >> * Add load_state power-domain >> * List cx and mx power-domains for MSM8996 >> >> .../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt | 16 >> ++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git >> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt >> index 98894e6ad456..50695cd86397 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt >> @@ -80,6 +80,22 @@ on the Qualcomm Hexagon core. >> reference to the pll-supply regulator to be held >> on behalf >> of the booting of the Hexagon core on MSM8996 SoCs >> >> +- power-domains: >> + Usage: required >> + Value type: <phandle> >> + Definition: reference to the list of 2 power-domains for the >> modem >> + sub-system on MSM8996 SoCs > > This is truly required for msm8996 SoCs? The code I'm looking at > doesn't try to get these power domains for 8996 so presumably you're > breaking backward compatibility with old device tree files by making > this required now. I don't personally know how widespread msm8996 > usage is w/ upstream, so I'd let Bjorn comment on whether he thinks > this is OK. > This is one of the reasons why the dt node for mss on 8996 has not been posted/merged upstream. Hence backward compatibility is not broken yet in mainline :) .. However it will break on official linaro integration releases (old dt + new kernel) > As with the other patches in this series, I personally prefer less > prose and more lists / tables of exactly what is required for which > compatible string. > > >> + reference to the list of 4 power-domains for the >> modem >> + sub-system on SDM845 SoCs >> + >> +- power-domain-names: >> + Usage: required >> + Value type: <stringlist> >> + Definition: must be "cx", "mx" for the modem sub-system on >> MSM8996 >> + SoCs >> + must be "cx", "mx", "mss", "load_state" for the >> modem >> + sub-system on SDM845 SoCs > > I haven't see a patch for using "load_state". Can you point at it? I > guess this was "aop" in your last version? > using load_state was Bjorn's suggestion and seemed more appropriate than aop > > -Doug
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt index 98894e6ad456..50695cd86397 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt @@ -80,6 +80,22 @@ on the Qualcomm Hexagon core. reference to the pll-supply regulator to be held on behalf of the booting of the Hexagon core on MSM8996 SoCs +- power-domains: + Usage: required + Value type: <phandle> + Definition: reference to the list of 2 power-domains for the modem + sub-system on MSM8996 SoCs + reference to the list of 4 power-domains for the modem + sub-system on SDM845 SoCs + +- power-domain-names: + Usage: required + Value type: <stringlist> + Definition: must be "cx", "mx" for the modem sub-system on MSM8996 + SoCs + must be "cx", "mx", "mss", "load_state" for the modem + sub-system on SDM845 SoCs + - qcom,smem-states: Usage: required Value type: <phandle>