diff mbox series

[v4,4/7] iommu/qcom: Properly reset the IOMMU context

Message ID 20191001220205.6423-5-kholk11@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Add support for QCOM IOMMU v2 and 500 | expand

Commit Message

AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Oct. 1, 2019, 10:02 p.m. UTC
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <kholk11@gmail.com>

To avoid context faults reset the context entirely on detach and
to ensure a fresh clean start also do a complete reset before
programming the context for domain initialization.

Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <kholk11@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/qcom_iommu.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Robin Murphy Oct. 2, 2019, 11:29 a.m. UTC | #1
On 01/10/2019 23:02, kholk11@gmail.com wrote:
> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <kholk11@gmail.com>
> 
> To avoid context faults reset the context entirely on detach and
> to ensure a fresh clean start also do a complete reset before
> programming the context for domain initialization.
> 
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <kholk11@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/qcom_iommu.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/qcom_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/qcom_iommu.c
> index c8957ec83b92..b4a38ef129e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/qcom_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/qcom_iommu.c
> @@ -220,6 +220,23 @@ static irqreturn_t qcom_iommu_fault(int irq, void *dev)
>   	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>   }
>   
> +static void qcom_iommu_reset_ctx(struct qcom_iommu_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> +	iommu_writel(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_FAR, 0);
> +	iommu_writel(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR, 0);
> +	iommu_writel(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_S1_MAIR1, 0);
> +	iommu_writel(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_PAR, 0);
> +	iommu_writel(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_S1_MAIR0, 0);
> +	iommu_writel(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_SCTLR, 0);
> +	iommu_writel(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_TCR2, 0);
> +	iommu_writel(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_TCR, 0);
> +	iommu_writeq(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_TTBR0, 0);
> +	iommu_writeq(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_TTBR1, 0);
> +
> +	/* Should we issue a TLBSYNC there instead? */

Unless there are outstanding TLB invalidations, it wouldn't achieve 
much. That said, doing a TBLIALL as part of the reset sequence *would* 
generally be a good idea.

Also, since the write to SCTLR affects the overall enable state of the 
context bank, it would be best to do that before touching anything else.

Robin.

> +	mb();
> +}
> +
>   static int qcom_iommu_init_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>   				  struct qcom_iommu_dev *qcom_iommu,
>   				  struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec)
> @@ -267,6 +284,8 @@ static int qcom_iommu_init_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>   			ctx->secure_init = true;
>   		}
>   
> +		qcom_iommu_reset_ctx(ctx);
> +
>   		/* TCR */
>   		iommu_writel(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_TCR2,
>   				(pgtbl_cfg.arm_lpae_s1_cfg.tcr >> 32) |
> @@ -412,8 +431,8 @@ static void qcom_iommu_detach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *de
>   	for (i = 0; i < fwspec->num_ids; i++) {
>   		struct qcom_iommu_ctx *ctx = to_ctx(fwspec, fwspec->ids[i]);
>   
> -		/* Disable the context bank: */
> -		iommu_writel(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_SCTLR, 0);
> +		/* Disable and reset the context bank */
> +		qcom_iommu_reset_ctx(ctx);
>   
>   		ctx->domain = NULL;
>   	}
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/qcom_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/qcom_iommu.c
index c8957ec83b92..b4a38ef129e3 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/qcom_iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/qcom_iommu.c
@@ -220,6 +220,23 @@  static irqreturn_t qcom_iommu_fault(int irq, void *dev)
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
+static void qcom_iommu_reset_ctx(struct qcom_iommu_ctx *ctx)
+{
+	iommu_writel(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_FAR, 0);
+	iommu_writel(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR, 0);
+	iommu_writel(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_S1_MAIR1, 0);
+	iommu_writel(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_PAR, 0);
+	iommu_writel(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_S1_MAIR0, 0);
+	iommu_writel(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_SCTLR, 0);
+	iommu_writel(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_TCR2, 0);
+	iommu_writel(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_TCR, 0);
+	iommu_writeq(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_TTBR0, 0);
+	iommu_writeq(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_TTBR1, 0);
+
+	/* Should we issue a TLBSYNC there instead? */
+	mb();
+}
+
 static int qcom_iommu_init_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain,
 				  struct qcom_iommu_dev *qcom_iommu,
 				  struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec)
@@ -267,6 +284,8 @@  static int qcom_iommu_init_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain,
 			ctx->secure_init = true;
 		}
 
+		qcom_iommu_reset_ctx(ctx);
+
 		/* TCR */
 		iommu_writel(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_TCR2,
 				(pgtbl_cfg.arm_lpae_s1_cfg.tcr >> 32) |
@@ -412,8 +431,8 @@  static void qcom_iommu_detach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *de
 	for (i = 0; i < fwspec->num_ids; i++) {
 		struct qcom_iommu_ctx *ctx = to_ctx(fwspec, fwspec->ids[i]);
 
-		/* Disable the context bank: */
-		iommu_writel(ctx, ARM_SMMU_CB_SCTLR, 0);
+		/* Disable and reset the context bank */
+		qcom_iommu_reset_ctx(ctx);
 
 		ctx->domain = NULL;
 	}