Message ID | 20211025151536.1048186-14-maxime@cerno.tech (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show |
Series | drm/bridge: Make panel and bridge probe order consistent | expand |
On Mon, 25 Oct 2021 17:15:28 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Commit 24417d5b0c00 ("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Implement .detach > callback") moved the unregistration of the bridge DSI device and bridge > itself to the detach callback. > > While this is correct for the DSI device detach and unregistration, the > bridge is added in the driver probe, and should thus be removed as part > of its remove callback. > > [...] Applied to drm/drm-misc (drm-misc-next). Thanks! Maxime
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c index 52030a82f3e1..3bfd07caf8d7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c @@ -297,7 +297,6 @@ static void sn65dsi83_detach(struct drm_bridge *bridge) mipi_dsi_detach(ctx->dsi); mipi_dsi_device_unregister(ctx->dsi); - drm_bridge_remove(&ctx->bridge); ctx->dsi = NULL; } @@ -693,6 +692,7 @@ static int sn65dsi83_remove(struct i2c_client *client) { struct sn65dsi83 *ctx = i2c_get_clientdata(client); + drm_bridge_remove(&ctx->bridge); of_node_put(ctx->host_node); return 0;