| Message ID | 20221014221121.7497-2-quic_molvera@quicinc.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add misc support for QDU1000/QRU1000 SoCs | expand |
On 14/10/2022 18:11, Melody Olvera wrote: > Add compatibles for scm driver for QDU1000 and QRU1000 platforms. > > Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@quicinc.com> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml > index c5b76c9f7ad0..47083f47f109 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml > @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ properties: > - qcom,scm-msm8994 > - qcom,scm-msm8996 > - qcom,scm-msm8998 > + - qcom,scm-qdu1000 > + - qcom,scm-qru1000 Why exactly we are no using qdu1000 as fallback? That was the recommendation in previous discussion. Patch is still incomplete - you still do no have proper changes in allOf for the clocks. If you want to say that this SoC does not take any clocks as input, then they should not be allowed. Best regards, Krzysztof
On 10/15/2022 6:34 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 14/10/2022 18:11, Melody Olvera wrote: >> Add compatibles for scm driver for QDU1000 and QRU1000 platforms. >> >> Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@quicinc.com> >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml | 16 ++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml >> index c5b76c9f7ad0..47083f47f109 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml >> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ properties: >> - qcom,scm-msm8994 >> - qcom,scm-msm8996 >> - qcom,scm-msm8998 >> + - qcom,scm-qdu1000 >> + - qcom,scm-qru1000 > Why exactly we are no using qdu1000 as fallback? That was the > recommendation in previous discussion. Will use only qdu; I think I misunderstood the outcome of that discussion. > > Patch is still incomplete - you still do no have proper changes in allOf > for the clocks. If you want to say that this SoC does not take any > clocks as input, then they should not be allowed. That is what I'm trying to say; it seems most of our most recent SoCs (sm8*) don't have any clocks associated with the scm. Does it make sense to remove the minItems earlier in the binding, or is there something else that would communicate this in allOf better? Thanks, Melody
On 19/10/2022 14:08, Melody Olvera wrote: > > > On 10/15/2022 6:34 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 14/10/2022 18:11, Melody Olvera wrote: >>> Add compatibles for scm driver for QDU1000 and QRU1000 platforms. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@quicinc.com> >>> --- >>> .../devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml | 16 ++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml >>> index c5b76c9f7ad0..47083f47f109 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml >>> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ properties: >>> - qcom,scm-msm8994 >>> - qcom,scm-msm8996 >>> - qcom,scm-msm8998 >>> + - qcom,scm-qdu1000 >>> + - qcom,scm-qru1000 >> Why exactly we are no using qdu1000 as fallback? That was the >> recommendation in previous discussion. > Will use only qdu; I think I misunderstood the outcome of that discussion. Actually, I think I commented about this in wrong patch. I think the outcome was to use two compatibles for most of the cases, but as a fallback, so: QDU: "qcom,qdu1000-rpmhpd" QRU: "qcom,qru1000-rpmhpd", "qcom,qdu1000-rpmhpd" (or skip entirely second if you do not customize QRU in DTSI) However here we already have a fallback, so these are fine: "qcom,scm-qdu1000", "qcom,scm" "qcom,scm-qru1000", "qcom,scm" Still assuming you customize them in DTSI... which does not seem the case, right? >> >> Patch is still incomplete - you still do no have proper changes in allOf >> for the clocks. If you want to say that this SoC does not take any >> clocks as input, then they should not be allowed. > That is what I'm trying to say; it seems most of our most recent SoCs (sm8*) don't have any > clocks associated with the scm. Does it make sense to remove the minItems earlier > in the binding, or is there something else that would communicate this in allOf better? > Then disallow clocks for your variant: - if: .... then: ... clocks: false clock-names: false Best regards, Krzysztof
On 10/20/2022 5:35 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 19/10/2022 14:08, Melody Olvera wrote: >> >> On 10/15/2022 6:34 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 14/10/2022 18:11, Melody Olvera wrote: >>>> Add compatibles for scm driver for QDU1000 and QRU1000 platforms. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@quicinc.com> >>>> --- >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml | 16 ++++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml >>>> index c5b76c9f7ad0..47083f47f109 100644 >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml >>>> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ properties: >>>> - qcom,scm-msm8994 >>>> - qcom,scm-msm8996 >>>> - qcom,scm-msm8998 >>>> + - qcom,scm-qdu1000 >>>> + - qcom,scm-qru1000 >>> Why exactly we are no using qdu1000 as fallback? That was the >>> recommendation in previous discussion. >> Will use only qdu; I think I misunderstood the outcome of that discussion. > Actually, I think I commented about this in wrong patch. I think the > outcome was to use two compatibles for most of the cases, but as a > fallback, so: > > QDU: "qcom,qdu1000-rpmhpd" > QRU: "qcom,qru1000-rpmhpd", "qcom,qdu1000-rpmhpd" > (or skip entirely second if you do not customize QRU in DTSI) > > However here we already have a fallback, so these are fine: > > "qcom,scm-qdu1000", "qcom,scm" > "qcom,scm-qru1000", "qcom,scm" > > Still assuming you customize them in DTSI... which does not seem the > case, right? Yeah dtsi is largely shared between RU and DU. It probably makes more sense to drop RU compat string all together unless there is a significant difference. >>> Patch is still incomplete - you still do no have proper changes in allOf >>> for the clocks. If you want to say that this SoC does not take any >>> clocks as input, then they should not be allowed. >> That is what I'm trying to say; it seems most of our most recent SoCs (sm8*) don't have any >> clocks associated with the scm. Does it make sense to remove the minItems earlier >> in the binding, or is there something else that would communicate this in allOf better? >> > > Then disallow clocks for your variant: > > - if: > .... > then: > ... > clocks: false > clock-names: false Got it; thanks. Thanks, Melody
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml index c5b76c9f7ad0..47083f47f109 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ properties: - qcom,scm-msm8994 - qcom,scm-msm8996 - qcom,scm-msm8998 + - qcom,scm-qdu1000 + - qcom,scm-qru1000 - qcom,scm-sc7180 - qcom,scm-sc7280 - qcom,scm-sc8280xp @@ -80,6 +82,20 @@ properties: description: TCSR hardware block allOf: + - if: + properties: + compatible: + contains: + enum: + - qcom,scm-qdu1000 + - qcom,scm-qru1000 + then: + properties: + '#reset-cells': + maxItems: 1 + + required: + - '#reset-cells' - if: properties: compatible:
Add compatibles for scm driver for QDU1000 and QRU1000 platforms. Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@quicinc.com> --- .../devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)