| Message ID | 20221026200429.162212-2-quic_molvera@quicinc.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add base device tree files for QDU1000/QRU1000 | expand |
On 26/10/2022 16:04, Melody Olvera wrote: > Update the bindings to allow for generic regulator nodes instead of > device-specific node names. > > Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@quicinc.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml > index 4a50f1d27724..0e7e07975f3a 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml > @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ properties: > $ref: /schemas/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml# > > patternProperties: > - '-regulators$': > + 'regulators$': This should be rather fixed like: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20220926092104.111449-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/ I don't know why there is such a popularity of adding specific model names as device node names... Best regards, Krzysztof
On 10/27/2022 8:08 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 26/10/2022 16:04, Melody Olvera wrote: >> Update the bindings to allow for generic regulator nodes instead of >> device-specific node names. >> >> Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@quicinc.com> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml >> index 4a50f1d27724..0e7e07975f3a 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml >> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ properties: >> $ref: /schemas/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml# >> >> patternProperties: >> - '-regulators$': >> + 'regulators$': > This should be rather fixed like: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20220926092104.111449-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/ Got it. Thanks, Melody > > I don't know why there is such a popularity of adding specific model > names as device node names...
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml index 4a50f1d27724..0e7e07975f3a 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ properties: $ref: /schemas/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml# patternProperties: - '-regulators$': + 'regulators$': $ref: /schemas/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.yaml# required:
Update the bindings to allow for generic regulator nodes instead of device-specific node names. Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@quicinc.com> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)