Message ID | 20230306152723.3090195-4-james.clark@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | devres: Provide krealloc_array | expand |
On 3/6/23 16:27, James Clark wrote: > > Now that it exists, use it instead of doing the multiplication and > checking for overflow manually. > > Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> > --- > drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c | 9 +++------ > drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c | 17 +++++++---------- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c b/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c > index 34cf336b3490..f0b71a1220e0 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c > @@ -1263,7 +1263,7 @@ static int ams_parse_firmware(struct iio_dev *indio_dev) > struct device *dev = indio_dev->dev.parent; > struct fwnode_handle *child = NULL; > struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(dev); > - size_t ams_size, dev_size; > + size_t ams_size; > int ret, ch_cnt = 0, i, rising_off, falling_off; > unsigned int num_channels = 0; > > @@ -1320,11 +1320,8 @@ static int ams_parse_firmware(struct iio_dev *indio_dev) > } > } > > - dev_size = array_size(sizeof(*dev_channels), num_channels); > - if (dev_size == SIZE_MAX) > - return -ENOMEM; > - > - dev_channels = devm_krealloc(dev, ams_channels, dev_size, GFP_KERNEL); > + dev_channels = devm_krealloc_array(dev, ams_channels, num_channels, > + sizeof(*dev_channels), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!dev_channels) > return -ENOMEM; > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c b/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c > index 292f2892d223..287df3bb951e 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c > @@ -613,20 +613,17 @@ static int xadc_update_scan_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, > const unsigned long *mask) > { > struct xadc *xadc = iio_priv(indio_dev); > - size_t new_size, n; > + size_t n; > void *data; > > n = bitmap_weight(mask, indio_dev->masklength); > > - if (check_mul_overflow(n, sizeof(*xadc->data), &new_size)) > - return -ENOMEM; > - > - data = devm_krealloc(indio_dev->dev.parent, xadc->data, > - new_size, GFP_KERNEL); > + data = devm_krealloc_array(indio_dev->dev.parent, xadc->data, > + n, sizeof(*xadc->data), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!data) > return -ENOMEM; > > - memset(data, 0, new_size); > + memset(data, 0, n*sizeof(*xadc->data)); this is not correct coding style. M
On 08/03/2023 11:58, Michal Simek wrote: > > > On 3/6/23 16:27, James Clark wrote: >> >> Now that it exists, use it instead of doing the multiplication and >> checking for overflow manually. >> >> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> >> --- >> drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c | 9 +++------ >> drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c | 17 +++++++---------- >> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c b/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c >> index 34cf336b3490..f0b71a1220e0 100644 >> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c >> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c >> @@ -1263,7 +1263,7 @@ static int ams_parse_firmware(struct iio_dev >> *indio_dev) >> struct device *dev = indio_dev->dev.parent; >> struct fwnode_handle *child = NULL; >> struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(dev); >> - size_t ams_size, dev_size; >> + size_t ams_size; >> int ret, ch_cnt = 0, i, rising_off, falling_off; >> unsigned int num_channels = 0; >> >> @@ -1320,11 +1320,8 @@ static int ams_parse_firmware(struct iio_dev >> *indio_dev) >> } >> } >> >> - dev_size = array_size(sizeof(*dev_channels), num_channels); >> - if (dev_size == SIZE_MAX) >> - return -ENOMEM; >> - >> - dev_channels = devm_krealloc(dev, ams_channels, dev_size, >> GFP_KERNEL); >> + dev_channels = devm_krealloc_array(dev, ams_channels, >> num_channels, >> + sizeof(*dev_channels), >> GFP_KERNEL); >> if (!dev_channels) >> return -ENOMEM; >> >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c >> b/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c >> index 292f2892d223..287df3bb951e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c >> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c >> @@ -613,20 +613,17 @@ static int xadc_update_scan_mode(struct iio_dev >> *indio_dev, >> const unsigned long *mask) >> { >> struct xadc *xadc = iio_priv(indio_dev); >> - size_t new_size, n; >> + size_t n; >> void *data; >> >> n = bitmap_weight(mask, indio_dev->masklength); >> >> - if (check_mul_overflow(n, sizeof(*xadc->data), &new_size)) >> - return -ENOMEM; >> - >> - data = devm_krealloc(indio_dev->dev.parent, xadc->data, >> - new_size, GFP_KERNEL); >> + data = devm_krealloc_array(indio_dev->dev.parent, xadc->data, >> + n, sizeof(*xadc->data), GFP_KERNEL); >> if (!data) >> return -ENOMEM; >> >> - memset(data, 0, new_size); >> + memset(data, 0, n*sizeof(*xadc->data)); > > this is not correct coding style. Oops, fixed in v2, thanks. > > M
diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c b/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c index 34cf336b3490..f0b71a1220e0 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c @@ -1263,7 +1263,7 @@ static int ams_parse_firmware(struct iio_dev *indio_dev) struct device *dev = indio_dev->dev.parent; struct fwnode_handle *child = NULL; struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(dev); - size_t ams_size, dev_size; + size_t ams_size; int ret, ch_cnt = 0, i, rising_off, falling_off; unsigned int num_channels = 0; @@ -1320,11 +1320,8 @@ static int ams_parse_firmware(struct iio_dev *indio_dev) } } - dev_size = array_size(sizeof(*dev_channels), num_channels); - if (dev_size == SIZE_MAX) - return -ENOMEM; - - dev_channels = devm_krealloc(dev, ams_channels, dev_size, GFP_KERNEL); + dev_channels = devm_krealloc_array(dev, ams_channels, num_channels, + sizeof(*dev_channels), GFP_KERNEL); if (!dev_channels) return -ENOMEM; diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c b/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c index 292f2892d223..287df3bb951e 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c @@ -613,20 +613,17 @@ static int xadc_update_scan_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, const unsigned long *mask) { struct xadc *xadc = iio_priv(indio_dev); - size_t new_size, n; + size_t n; void *data; n = bitmap_weight(mask, indio_dev->masklength); - if (check_mul_overflow(n, sizeof(*xadc->data), &new_size)) - return -ENOMEM; - - data = devm_krealloc(indio_dev->dev.parent, xadc->data, - new_size, GFP_KERNEL); + data = devm_krealloc_array(indio_dev->dev.parent, xadc->data, + n, sizeof(*xadc->data), GFP_KERNEL); if (!data) return -ENOMEM; - memset(data, 0, new_size); + memset(data, 0, n*sizeof(*xadc->data)); xadc->data = data; return 0; @@ -1281,9 +1278,9 @@ static int xadc_parse_dt(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, unsigned int *conf, int irq) } indio_dev->num_channels = num_channels; - indio_dev->channels = devm_krealloc(dev, channels, - sizeof(*channels) * num_channels, - GFP_KERNEL); + indio_dev->channels = devm_krealloc_array(dev, channels, + num_channels, sizeof(*channels), + GFP_KERNEL); /* If we can't resize the channels array, just use the original */ if (!indio_dev->channels) indio_dev->channels = channels;
Now that it exists, use it instead of doing the multiplication and checking for overflow manually. Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> --- drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c | 9 +++------ drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c | 17 +++++++---------- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)