| Message ID | 20230627-sm6125-dpu-v2-1-03e430a2078c@somainline.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | drm/msm: Add SM6125 MDSS/DPU hardware and enable Sony Xperia 10 II panel | expand |
On 27.06.2023 22:14, Marijn Suijten wrote: > The regulator setup was likely copied from other SoCs by mistake. Just > like SM6125 the DSI PHY on this platform is not getting power from a > regulator but from the MX power domain. > > Fixes: 572e9fd6d14a ("drm/msm/dsi: Add phy configuration for QCM2290") > Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org> > --- Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> Konrad > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c > index 3ce45b023e63..31deda1c664a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c > @@ -1087,8 +1087,6 @@ const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_14nm_8953_cfgs = { > > const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_14nm_2290_cfgs = { > .has_phy_lane = true, > - .regulator_data = dsi_phy_14nm_17mA_regulators, > - .num_regulators = ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_phy_14nm_17mA_regulators), > .ops = { > .enable = dsi_14nm_phy_enable, > .disable = dsi_14nm_phy_disable, >
On 27/06/2023 23:14, Marijn Suijten wrote: > The regulator setup was likely copied from other SoCs by mistake. Just > like SM6125 the DSI PHY on this platform is not getting power from a > regulator but from the MX power domain. > > Fixes: 572e9fd6d14a ("drm/msm/dsi: Add phy configuration for QCM2290") > Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
On 6/27/2023 1:14 PM, Marijn Suijten wrote: > The regulator setup was likely copied from other SoCs by mistake. Just > like SM6125 the DSI PHY on this platform is not getting power from a > regulator but from the MX power domain. > > Fixes: 572e9fd6d14a ("drm/msm/dsi: Add phy configuration for QCM2290") > Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c index 3ce45b023e63..31deda1c664a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c @@ -1087,8 +1087,6 @@ const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_14nm_8953_cfgs = { const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_14nm_2290_cfgs = { .has_phy_lane = true, - .regulator_data = dsi_phy_14nm_17mA_regulators, - .num_regulators = ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_phy_14nm_17mA_regulators), .ops = { .enable = dsi_14nm_phy_enable, .disable = dsi_14nm_phy_disable,
The regulator setup was likely copied from other SoCs by mistake. Just like SM6125 the DSI PHY on this platform is not getting power from a regulator but from the MX power domain. Fixes: 572e9fd6d14a ("drm/msm/dsi: Add phy configuration for QCM2290") Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org> --- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)