From patchwork Wed Aug 9 03:44:43 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13347376 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 379E1C04E69 for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 03:45:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230230AbjHIDph (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2023 23:45:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46518 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229485AbjHIDpg (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2023 23:45:36 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E87A31BC3; Tue, 8 Aug 2023 20:45:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.53]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4RLGBs3l84zmXBn; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 11:44:21 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.90.53.73) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.27; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 11:45:31 +0800 From: Ruan Jinjie To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [PATCH -next 5/7] drm/virtio: Remove an unnecessary NULL value Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 11:44:43 +0800 Message-ID: <20230809034445.434902-6-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20230809034445.434902-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20230809034445.434902-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.90.53.73] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org The NULL initialization of the pointer assigned by kzalloc() first is not necessary, because if the kzalloc() failed, the pointer will be assigned NULL, otherwise it works as usual. so remove it. Signed-off-by: Ruan Jinjie Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko --- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_submit.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_submit.c index 3c00135ead45..82563dbec2ab 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_submit.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_submit.c @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static int virtio_gpu_fence_event_create(struct drm_device *dev, struct virtio_gpu_fence *fence, u32 ring_idx) { - struct virtio_gpu_fence_event *e = NULL; + struct virtio_gpu_fence_event *e; int ret; e = kzalloc(sizeof(*e), GFP_KERNEL);