diff mbox series

[v4,12/23] pinctrl: mediatek: Make use of PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC()

Message ID 20231129161459.1002323-13-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable
Headers show
Series pinctrl: Convert struct group_desc to use struct pingroup | expand

Commit Message

Andy Shevchenko Nov. 29, 2023, 4:06 p.m. UTC
Make use of PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC() instead of open coding it.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.h | 7 +------
 drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.h | 7 +------
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Comments

Marek Szyprowski Dec. 4, 2023, 11:40 a.m. UTC | #1
On 29.11.2023 17:06, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Make use of PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC() instead of open coding it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

This patch landed in linux-next as commit 1949e4630c3b ("pinctrl: 
mediatek: Make use of PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC()"). Unfortunately it causes a 
build break of ARM64 arch with standard defconfig.

> ---
>   drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.h | 7 +------
>   drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.h | 7 +------
>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.h b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.h
> index e1b4b82b9d3d..22ef1ffbcdcb 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.h
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.h
> @@ -38,12 +38,7 @@
>   	}
>   
>   #define PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP(name, id)			\
> -	{						\
> -		name,					\
> -		id##_pins,				\
> -		ARRAY_SIZE(id##_pins),			\
> -		id##_funcs,				\
> -	}
> +	PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC(name, id##_pins, ARRAY_SIZE(id##_pins), id##_funcs)
>   int mtk_moore_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>   			    const struct mtk_pin_soc *soc);
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.h b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.h
> index 8762ac599329..f208a904c4a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.h
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.h
> @@ -50,12 +50,7 @@
>   	}
>   
>   #define PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP(name, id)			\
> -	{						\
> -		name,					\
> -		id##_pins,				\
> -		ARRAY_SIZE(id##_pins),			\
> -		id##_funcs,				\
> -	}
> +	PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC(name, id##_pins, ARRAY_SIZE(id##_pins), id##_funcs)
>   
>   int mtk_paris_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev);


PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC() macro from drivers/pinctrl/core.h contains a cast 
to (struct group_desc), what breaks users of the above macros.

Best regards
Krzysztof Kozlowski Dec. 4, 2023, 12:38 p.m. UTC | #2
On 04/12/2023 12:40, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 29.11.2023 17:06, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> Make use of PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC() instead of open coding it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> 
> This patch landed in linux-next as commit 1949e4630c3b ("pinctrl: 
> mediatek: Make use of PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC()"). Unfortunately it causes a 
> build break of ARM64 arch with standard defconfig.

Not only arm64, but also arm32. Defconfigs, so something completely
standard. This wasn't compiled which is quite surprising because cross
building defconfigs is trivial, not even mentioning testing your trees
with LKP. :(

https://lore.kernel.org/all/ed981149-5d96-43a9-9534-c1e52443a983@linaro.org/

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Andy Shevchenko Dec. 4, 2023, 1:10 p.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 12:40:38PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 29.11.2023 17:06, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Make use of PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC() instead of open coding it.

> PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC() macro from drivers/pinctrl/core.h contains a cast
> to (struct group_desc), what breaks users of the above macros.

There is no cast (*).
Thanks for report, I will check.

But this was v4 of the series and LKP actually sent a positive feedback.
Besides that I have tested this locally with modules enabled.

*) It's a compound literal, _not_ a cast.
   Taking above into consideration I'm wondering what compilers
   are in use?
Krzysztof Kozlowski Dec. 4, 2023, 1:18 p.m. UTC | #4
On 04/12/2023 14:10, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 12:40:38PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> On 29.11.2023 17:06, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> Make use of PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC() instead of open coding it.
> 
>> PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC() macro from drivers/pinctrl/core.h contains a cast
>> to (struct group_desc), what breaks users of the above macros.
> 
> There is no cast (*).
> Thanks for report, I will check.
> 
> But this was v4 of the series and LKP actually sent a positive feedback.
> Besides that I have tested this locally with modules enabled.
> 
> *) It's a compound literal, _not_ a cast.
>    Taking above into consideration I'm wondering what compilers
>    are in use?

In my case: standard provided by Ubuntu 22.04, so: gcc version 11.4.0
(Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04)


Best regards,
Krzysztof
Geert Uytterhoeven Dec. 4, 2023, 1:19 p.m. UTC | #5
Hi Andy,

On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 2:10 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 12:40:38PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > On 29.11.2023 17:06, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > Make use of PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC() instead of open coding it.
>
> > PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC() macro from drivers/pinctrl/core.h contains a cast
> > to (struct group_desc), what breaks users of the above macros.
>
> There is no cast (*).
> Thanks for report, I will check.
>
> But this was v4 of the series and LKP actually sent a positive feedback.
> Besides that I have tested this locally with modules enabled.
>
> *) It's a compound literal, _not_ a cast.
>    Taking above into consideration I'm wondering what compilers
>    are in use?

kisskb reported the following m68k failures to me:
    linux-next/m68k-allmodconfig/m68k-gcc8
    linux-next/m68k-allmodconfig/m68k-gcc11
    linux-next/m68k-allmodconfig/m68k-gcc12

However, according to [1], linux-next/m68k-allmodconfig/m68k-gcc13
did succeed, so I guess you are using gcc13?

[1] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/629a3b49f3f957e975253c54846090b8d5ed2e9b/

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert
Krzysztof Kozlowski Dec. 4, 2023, 1:20 p.m. UTC | #6
On 04/12/2023 14:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/12/2023 14:10, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 12:40:38PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>> On 29.11.2023 17:06, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>> Make use of PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC() instead of open coding it.
>>
>>> PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC() macro from drivers/pinctrl/core.h contains a cast
>>> to (struct group_desc), what breaks users of the above macros.
>>
>> There is no cast (*).
>> Thanks for report, I will check.
>>
>> But this was v4 of the series and LKP actually sent a positive feedback.
>> Besides that I have tested this locally with modules enabled.
>>
>> *) It's a compound literal, _not_ a cast.
>>    Taking above into consideration I'm wondering what compilers
>>    are in use?
> 
> In my case: standard provided by Ubuntu 22.04, so: gcc version 11.4.0
> (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04)

This was from my local machine. The ones used on the server are
mentioned in one of the steps:

https://krzk.eu/#/builders/5/builds/2532/steps/5/logs/property_changes

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Andy Shevchenko Dec. 4, 2023, 1:32 p.m. UTC | #7
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 02:19:10PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Andy,
> 
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 2:10 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 12:40:38PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > > On 29.11.2023 17:06, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > Make use of PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC() instead of open coding it.
> >
> > > PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC() macro from drivers/pinctrl/core.h contains a cast
> > > to (struct group_desc), what breaks users of the above macros.
> >
> > There is no cast (*).
> > Thanks for report, I will check.
> >
> > But this was v4 of the series and LKP actually sent a positive feedback.
> > Besides that I have tested this locally with modules enabled.
> >
> > *) It's a compound literal, _not_ a cast.
> >    Taking above into consideration I'm wondering what compilers
> >    are in use?
> 
> kisskb reported the following m68k failures to me:
>     linux-next/m68k-allmodconfig/m68k-gcc8
>     linux-next/m68k-allmodconfig/m68k-gcc11
>     linux-next/m68k-allmodconfig/m68k-gcc12
> 
> However, according to [1], linux-next/m68k-allmodconfig/m68k-gcc13
> did succeed, so I guess you are using gcc13?

Yes, I compiled with these:

$ gcc --version
gcc (Debian 13.2.0-5) 13.2.0
Copyright (C) 2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

$ clang --version
Debian clang version 16.0.6 (16)
	Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
	Thread model: posix
	InstalledDir: /usr/bin
Geert Uytterhoeven Dec. 4, 2023, 1:39 p.m. UTC | #8
Hi Andy,

On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 2:32 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 02:19:10PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 2:10 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 12:40:38PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > > > On 29.11.2023 17:06, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > Make use of PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC() instead of open coding it.
> > >
> > > > PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC() macro from drivers/pinctrl/core.h contains a cast
> > > > to (struct group_desc), what breaks users of the above macros.
> > >
> > > There is no cast (*).
> > > Thanks for report, I will check.
> > >
> > > But this was v4 of the series and LKP actually sent a positive feedback.
> > > Besides that I have tested this locally with modules enabled.
> > >
> > > *) It's a compound literal, _not_ a cast.
> > >    Taking above into consideration I'm wondering what compilers
> > >    are in use?
> >
> > kisskb reported the following m68k failures to me:
> >     linux-next/m68k-allmodconfig/m68k-gcc8
> >     linux-next/m68k-allmodconfig/m68k-gcc11
> >     linux-next/m68k-allmodconfig/m68k-gcc12
> >
> > However, according to [1], linux-next/m68k-allmodconfig/m68k-gcc13
> > did succeed, so I guess you are using gcc13?
>
> Yes, I compiled with these:
>
> $ gcc --version
> gcc (Debian 13.2.0-5) 13.2.0

Time to install and try an older version ;-)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert
Andy Shevchenko Dec. 4, 2023, 4:02 p.m. UTC | #9
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 02:39:37PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 2:32 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 02:19:10PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 2:10 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 12:40:38PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > > > > On 29.11.2023 17:06, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > > Make use of PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC() instead of open coding it.
> > > >
> > > > > PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC() macro from drivers/pinctrl/core.h contains a cast
> > > > > to (struct group_desc), what breaks users of the above macros.
> > > >
> > > > There is no cast (*).
> > > > Thanks for report, I will check.
> > > >
> > > > But this was v4 of the series and LKP actually sent a positive feedback.
> > > > Besides that I have tested this locally with modules enabled.
> > > >
> > > > *) It's a compound literal, _not_ a cast.
> > > >    Taking above into consideration I'm wondering what compilers
> > > >    are in use?
> > >
> > > kisskb reported the following m68k failures to me:
> > >     linux-next/m68k-allmodconfig/m68k-gcc8
> > >     linux-next/m68k-allmodconfig/m68k-gcc11
> > >     linux-next/m68k-allmodconfig/m68k-gcc12
> > >
> > > However, according to [1], linux-next/m68k-allmodconfig/m68k-gcc13
> > > did succeed, so I guess you are using gcc13?
> >
> > Yes, I compiled with these:
> >
> > $ gcc --version
> > gcc (Debian 13.2.0-5) 13.2.0
> 
> Time to install and try an older version ;-)

Yeah, compound literals seems the often-to-break topic (as per GCC bugzilla).
Tried with GCC 8 for ARM64 and indeed it doesn't build it well.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.h b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.h
index e1b4b82b9d3d..22ef1ffbcdcb 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.h
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.h
@@ -38,12 +38,7 @@ 
 	}
 
 #define PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP(name, id)			\
-	{						\
-		name,					\
-		id##_pins,				\
-		ARRAY_SIZE(id##_pins),			\
-		id##_funcs,				\
-	}
+	PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC(name, id##_pins, ARRAY_SIZE(id##_pins), id##_funcs)
 
 int mtk_moore_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
 			    const struct mtk_pin_soc *soc);
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.h b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.h
index 8762ac599329..f208a904c4a8 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.h
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.h
@@ -50,12 +50,7 @@ 
 	}
 
 #define PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP(name, id)			\
-	{						\
-		name,					\
-		id##_pins,				\
-		ARRAY_SIZE(id##_pins),			\
-		id##_funcs,				\
-	}
+	PINCTRL_GROUP_DESC(name, id##_pins, ARRAY_SIZE(id##_pins), id##_funcs)
 
 int mtk_paris_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev);