Message ID | 20240905-preemption-a750-t-v3-7-fd947699f7bc@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | Preemption support for A7XX | expand |
On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 04:51:25PM +0200, Antonino Maniscalco wrote: > Add trace points corresponding to preemption being triggered and being > completed for latency measurement purposes. > > Signed-off-by: Antonino Maniscalco <antomani103@gmail.com> > Tested-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> # on SM8650-QRD > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c | 7 +++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_trace.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c > index ec44f44d925f..ca9d36c107f2 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ > #include "a6xx_gpu.h" > #include "a6xx_gmu.xml.h" > #include "msm_mmu.h" > +#include "msm_gpu_trace.h" > > /* > * Try to transition the preemption state from old to new. Return > @@ -143,6 +144,8 @@ void a6xx_preempt_irq(struct msm_gpu *gpu) > > set_preempt_state(a6xx_gpu, PREEMPT_NONE); > > + trace_msm_gpu_preemption_irq(a6xx_gpu->cur_ring->id); > + > /* > * Retrigger preemption to avoid a deadlock that might occur when preemption > * is skipped due to it being already in flight when requested. > @@ -264,6 +267,10 @@ void a6xx_preempt_trigger(struct msm_gpu *gpu) > */ > ring->skip_inline_wptr = false; > > + trace_msm_gpu_preemption_trigger( > + a6xx_gpu->cur_ring ? a6xx_gpu->cur_ring->id : -1, Can't we avoid this check? -Akhil. > + ring ? ring->id : -1); > + > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ring->preempt_lock, flags); > > gpu_write64(gpu, > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_trace.h > index ac40d857bc45..7f863282db0d 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_trace.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_trace.h > @@ -177,6 +177,34 @@ TRACE_EVENT(msm_gpu_resume, > TP_printk("%u", __entry->dummy) > ); > > +TRACE_EVENT(msm_gpu_preemption_trigger, > + TP_PROTO(int ring_id_from, int ring_id_to), > + TP_ARGS(ring_id_from, ring_id_to), > + TP_STRUCT__entry( > + __field(int, ring_id_from) > + __field(int, ring_id_to) > + ), > + TP_fast_assign( > + __entry->ring_id_from = ring_id_from; > + __entry->ring_id_to = ring_id_to; > + ), > + TP_printk("preempting %u -> %u", > + __entry->ring_id_from, > + __entry->ring_id_to) > +); > + > +TRACE_EVENT(msm_gpu_preemption_irq, > + TP_PROTO(u32 ring_id), > + TP_ARGS(ring_id), > + TP_STRUCT__entry( > + __field(u32, ring_id) > + ), > + TP_fast_assign( > + __entry->ring_id = ring_id; > + ), > + TP_printk("preempted to %u", __entry->ring_id) > +); > + > #endif > > #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH > > -- > 2.46.0 >
On 9/6/24 10:11 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote: > On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 04:51:25PM +0200, Antonino Maniscalco wrote: >> Add trace points corresponding to preemption being triggered and being >> completed for latency measurement purposes. >> >> Signed-off-by: Antonino Maniscalco <antomani103@gmail.com> >> Tested-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> # on SM8650-QRD >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c | 7 +++++++ >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_trace.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c >> index ec44f44d925f..ca9d36c107f2 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c >> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ >> #include "a6xx_gpu.h" >> #include "a6xx_gmu.xml.h" >> #include "msm_mmu.h" >> +#include "msm_gpu_trace.h" >> >> /* >> * Try to transition the preemption state from old to new. Return >> @@ -143,6 +144,8 @@ void a6xx_preempt_irq(struct msm_gpu *gpu) >> >> set_preempt_state(a6xx_gpu, PREEMPT_NONE); >> >> + trace_msm_gpu_preemption_irq(a6xx_gpu->cur_ring->id); >> + >> /* >> * Retrigger preemption to avoid a deadlock that might occur when preemption >> * is skipped due to it being already in flight when requested. >> @@ -264,6 +267,10 @@ void a6xx_preempt_trigger(struct msm_gpu *gpu) >> */ >> ring->skip_inline_wptr = false; >> >> + trace_msm_gpu_preemption_trigger( >> + a6xx_gpu->cur_ring ? a6xx_gpu->cur_ring->id : -1, > > Can't we avoid this check? > Sorry yeah you had requested this change but I had forgotten to do it. > -Akhil. > >> + ring ? ring->id : -1); >> + >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ring->preempt_lock, flags); >> >> gpu_write64(gpu, >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_trace.h >> index ac40d857bc45..7f863282db0d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_trace.h >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_trace.h >> @@ -177,6 +177,34 @@ TRACE_EVENT(msm_gpu_resume, >> TP_printk("%u", __entry->dummy) >> ); >> >> +TRACE_EVENT(msm_gpu_preemption_trigger, >> + TP_PROTO(int ring_id_from, int ring_id_to), >> + TP_ARGS(ring_id_from, ring_id_to), >> + TP_STRUCT__entry( >> + __field(int, ring_id_from) >> + __field(int, ring_id_to) >> + ), >> + TP_fast_assign( >> + __entry->ring_id_from = ring_id_from; >> + __entry->ring_id_to = ring_id_to; >> + ), >> + TP_printk("preempting %u -> %u", >> + __entry->ring_id_from, >> + __entry->ring_id_to) >> +); >> + >> +TRACE_EVENT(msm_gpu_preemption_irq, >> + TP_PROTO(u32 ring_id), >> + TP_ARGS(ring_id), >> + TP_STRUCT__entry( >> + __field(u32, ring_id) >> + ), >> + TP_fast_assign( >> + __entry->ring_id = ring_id; >> + ), >> + TP_printk("preempted to %u", __entry->ring_id) >> +); >> + >> #endif >> >> #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH >> >> -- >> 2.46.0 >> Best regards,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c index ec44f44d925f..ca9d36c107f2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ #include "a6xx_gpu.h" #include "a6xx_gmu.xml.h" #include "msm_mmu.h" +#include "msm_gpu_trace.h" /* * Try to transition the preemption state from old to new. Return @@ -143,6 +144,8 @@ void a6xx_preempt_irq(struct msm_gpu *gpu) set_preempt_state(a6xx_gpu, PREEMPT_NONE); + trace_msm_gpu_preemption_irq(a6xx_gpu->cur_ring->id); + /* * Retrigger preemption to avoid a deadlock that might occur when preemption * is skipped due to it being already in flight when requested. @@ -264,6 +267,10 @@ void a6xx_preempt_trigger(struct msm_gpu *gpu) */ ring->skip_inline_wptr = false; + trace_msm_gpu_preemption_trigger( + a6xx_gpu->cur_ring ? a6xx_gpu->cur_ring->id : -1, + ring ? ring->id : -1); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ring->preempt_lock, flags); gpu_write64(gpu, diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_trace.h index ac40d857bc45..7f863282db0d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_trace.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_trace.h @@ -177,6 +177,34 @@ TRACE_EVENT(msm_gpu_resume, TP_printk("%u", __entry->dummy) ); +TRACE_EVENT(msm_gpu_preemption_trigger, + TP_PROTO(int ring_id_from, int ring_id_to), + TP_ARGS(ring_id_from, ring_id_to), + TP_STRUCT__entry( + __field(int, ring_id_from) + __field(int, ring_id_to) + ), + TP_fast_assign( + __entry->ring_id_from = ring_id_from; + __entry->ring_id_to = ring_id_to; + ), + TP_printk("preempting %u -> %u", + __entry->ring_id_from, + __entry->ring_id_to) +); + +TRACE_EVENT(msm_gpu_preemption_irq, + TP_PROTO(u32 ring_id), + TP_ARGS(ring_id), + TP_STRUCT__entry( + __field(u32, ring_id) + ), + TP_fast_assign( + __entry->ring_id = ring_id; + ), + TP_printk("preempted to %u", __entry->ring_id) +); + #endif #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH