diff mbox series

[7/8] drm/msm/dpu: link DSPP_2/_3 blocks on X1E80100

Message ID 20241216-dpu-fix-catalog-v1-7-15bf0807dba1@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable
Headers show
Series drm/msm/dpu: catalog corrections | expand

Commit Message

Dmitry Baryshkov Dec. 16, 2024, 8:27 a.m. UTC
Link DSPP_2 to the LM_2 and DSPP_3 to the LM_3 mixer blocks.

Fixes: e3b1f369db5a ("drm/msm/dpu: Add X1E80100 support")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_9_2_x1e80100.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Comments

Abhinav Kumar Dec. 16, 2024, 10:42 p.m. UTC | #1
On 12/16/2024 12:27 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Link DSPP_2 to the LM_2 and DSPP_3 to the LM_3 mixer blocks.
> 
> Fixes: e3b1f369db5a ("drm/msm/dpu: Add X1E80100 support")
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_9_2_x1e80100.h | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 

Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>
Johan Hovold Dec. 17, 2024, 8:41 a.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 10:27:28AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Link DSPP_2 to the LM_2 and DSPP_3 to the LM_3 mixer blocks.

Please say something about why you're doing this and what the expected
outcome of doing so is.

There is currently no way for a third party (e.g. stable or distro
maintainer) to determine what this patch does, if it needs to be
backported or if it's essentially just a clean up like Abhinav indicated
in one of his replies.

> Fixes: e3b1f369db5a ("drm/msm/dpu: Add X1E80100 support")
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>

Johan
Dmitry Baryshkov Dec. 17, 2024, 10:38 a.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 09:41:44AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 10:27:28AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > Link DSPP_2 to the LM_2 and DSPP_3 to the LM_3 mixer blocks.
> 
> Please say something about why you're doing this and what the expected
> outcome of doing so is.
> 
> There is currently no way for a third party (e.g. stable or distro
> maintainer) to determine what this patch does, if it needs to be
> backported or if it's essentially just a clean up like Abhinav indicated
> in one of his replies.

These patches allow using colour transformation matrix (aka night mode)
with more outputs at the same time. I think at this point only CrOS
compositor actually uses CTM, so these changes do not need to be
backported. However they are not cleanups, it was a feedback for the
SM6150 patch for the reasons expressed in the Abhinav's email.

> 
> > Fixes: e3b1f369db5a ("drm/msm/dpu: Add X1E80100 support")
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> 
> Johan
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_9_2_x1e80100.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_9_2_x1e80100.h
index d61895bb396fb4287e9b41807a3bb0cdb25d4e25..4f110be6b750d30e158d517aaa507c7b4eda0af4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_9_2_x1e80100.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_9_2_x1e80100.h
@@ -159,6 +159,7 @@  static const struct dpu_lm_cfg x1e80100_lm[] = {
 		.sblk = &sdm845_lm_sblk,
 		.lm_pair = LM_3,
 		.pingpong = PINGPONG_2,
+		.dspp = DSPP_2,
 	}, {
 		.name = "lm_3", .id = LM_3,
 		.base = 0x47000, .len = 0x320,
@@ -166,6 +167,7 @@  static const struct dpu_lm_cfg x1e80100_lm[] = {
 		.sblk = &sdm845_lm_sblk,
 		.lm_pair = LM_2,
 		.pingpong = PINGPONG_3,
+		.dspp = DSPP_3,
 	}, {
 		.name = "lm_4", .id = LM_4,
 		.base = 0x48000, .len = 0x320,