@@ -429,6 +429,16 @@ static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *sc8280xp_domains[] = {
NULL,
};
+/* Unlike SDM660, SDM630/636 lack CDSP */
+static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *sdm630_domains[] = {
+ &adsp_audio_pd,
+ &adsp_root_pd,
+ &adsp_sensor_pd,
+ &mpss_root_pd,
+ &mpss_wlan_pd,
+ NULL,
+};
+
static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *sdm660_domains[] = {
&adsp_audio_pd,
&adsp_root_pd,
@@ -546,6 +556,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_pdm_domains[] __maybe_unused = {
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7280", .data = sc7280_domains, },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x", .data = sc8180x_domains, },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp", .data = sc8280xp_domains, },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sdm630", .data = sdm630_domains, },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sdm636", .data = sdm630_domains, },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sda660", .data = sdm660_domains, },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm660", .data = sdm660_domains, },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm670", .data = sdm670_domains, },
Add missing compatibles and pdm_domain_data for SDM630 and SDM636. Unlike their older brother (SDM660) these two cut down SoCs lack CDSP. Other protection domains are the same as the ones for SDM660. Signed-off-by: Alexey Minnekhanov <alexeymin@postmarketos.org> --- drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)