| Message ID | CAMuHMdUoLp1oVT_=NG8HS-jgG6AhOeVUsGgu7fLbGY+7A+0cOg@mail.gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable, archived |
| Delegated to: | Andy Gross |
| Headers | show |
Hi Geert, everyone, On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 10:23 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > Hi Sricharan, Robin, > > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> wrote: >> On 5/3/2017 3:24 PM, Robin Murphy wrote: >>> On 02/05/17 19:35, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> wrote: >>>>> From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> >>>>> >>>>> Failures to look up an IOMMU when parsing the DT iommus property need to >>>>> be handled separately from the .of_xlate() failures to support deferred >>>>> probing. >>>>> >>>>> The lack of a registered IOMMU can be caused by the lack of a driver for >>>>> the IOMMU, the IOMMU device probe not having been performed yet, having >>>>> been deferred, or having failed. >>>>> >>>>> The first case occurs when the device tree describes the bus master and >>>>> IOMMU topology correctly but no device driver exists for the IOMMU yet >>>>> or the device driver has not been compiled in. Return NULL, the caller >>>>> will configure the device without an IOMMU. >>>>> >>>>> The second and third cases are handled by deferring the probe of the bus >>>>> master device which will eventually get reprobed after the IOMMU. >>>>> >>>>> The last case is currently handled by deferring the probe of the bus >>>>> master device as well. A mechanism to either configure the bus master >>>>> device without an IOMMU or to fail the bus master device probe depending >>>>> on whether the IOMMU is optional or mandatory would be a good >>>>> enhancement. >>>>> >>>>> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pichart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> >>>> >>>> This patch broke Renesas R-Car Gen3 platforms in renesas-drivers. >>>> As the IOMMU nodes in DT are not yet enabled, all devices having iommus >>>> properties in DT now fail to probe. >>> >>> How exactly do they fail to probe? Per d7b0558230e4, if there are no ops >>> registered then they should merely defer until we reach the point of >>> giving up and ignoring the IOMMU. Is it just that you have no other >>> late-probing drivers or post-init module loads to kick the deferred >>> queue after that point? I did try to find a way to explicitly kick it >>> from a suitably late initcall, but there didn't seem to be any obvious >>> public interface - anyone have any suggestions? >>> >>> I think that's more of a general problem with the probe deferral >>> mechanism itself (I've seen the same thing happen with some of the >>> CoreSight stuff on Juno due to the number of inter-component >>> dependencies) rather than any specific fault of this series. > > I had a deeper look into the issue. > > What changed, is that of_dma_configure() now returns an error code, > and dma_configure() looks at it. > > Actually there are two failure modes: > 1. Devices with an iommus property pointing to a disabled IOMMU node. > These return -EPROBE_DEFER, and are now retried forever. > 2. Devices that are blacklisted in the IPMMU driver, as we don't want to > use them with an IOMMU yet. > These return -ENODEV, due to ipmmu_of_xlate_dma(). > >> I was thinking of an additional check like below to avoid the >> situation ? >> >> From 499b6e662f60f23740b8880882b0a16f16434501 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> >> Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 13:16:59 +0530 >> Subject: [PATCH] iommu: of: Fix check for returning EPROBE_DEFER >> >> While returning EPROBE_DEFER for iommu masters >> take in to account of iommu nodes that could be >> marked in DT as 'status=disabled', in which case >> simply return NULL and let the master's probe >> continue rather than deferring. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> >> --- >> drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c >> index 9f44ee8..e6e9bec 100644 >> --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c >> @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ static bool of_iommu_driver_present(struct device_node *np) >> >> ops = iommu_ops_from_fwnode(fwnode); >> if ((ops && !ops->of_xlate) || >> + !of_device_is_available(iommu_spec->np) || >> (!ops && !of_iommu_driver_present(iommu_spec->np))) >> return NULL; > > Thanks, this fixes the first class of failures. > > The second class can be worked around using: > > --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c > @@ -196,6 +196,11 @@ static const struct iommu_ops > ops = of_iommu_xlate(dev, &iommu_spec); > of_node_put(iommu_spec.np); > idx++; > + if (PTR_ERR(ops) == -ENODEV) { > + dev_info(dev, "%s: Ignoring -ENODEV => NULL\n", > + __func__); > + return NULL; > + } > if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ops)) > break; > } > > but obviously that's too hackish to apply... > Magnus, do you have a suggestion? Thanks for your efforts guys! I've recently been working on up-porting the IPMMU patches and addressing review comments. Now with my local driver stack on top of v4.12-rc (a95cfad) I did not notice these issues initially since I only tested devices with IPMMU enabled. Once these issues were pointed out to me by Geert I have now reproduced the 64-bit ARM specific ones on r8a7796 Salvator-X. On my r8a7796 platform I'm using the following IOMMU and DMA Engine devices: IOMMU device IPMMU-DS0 - Connected to SYS-DMAC0 IOMMU device IPMMU-DS1 - Connected to SYS-DMAC1 and SYS-DMAC2 IOMMU device IPMMU-MM - Root device serving IPMMU-DS0 and IPMMU-DS1 For testing the serial port SCIF1 is used with DMA Engine devices SYS-DMAC1 or SYS-DMAC2. The software environment is configured as follows: - The DTS comes with all devices above enabled except IPMMU-DS0 which comes with status = "disabled". - The IPMMU driver is during run time only allowing use of SYS-DMAC2. For other devices ->of_xlate() returns -ENODEV. The above used to work just fine with v4.11 or earlier. My observations for v4.12-rc: 1) Default state for a95cfad The devices SYS-DMAC0 and SYS-DMAC1 will never probe. However SYS-DMAC2 is fine. 2) After applying "[PATCH] iommu: of: Fix check for returning EPROBE_DEFER" [1] This fixes SYS-DMAC0 that now probes and operates without IPMMU-DS0 as expected. Same as v4.11 or earlier. 3) After also applying "[PATCH] of: iommu: Ignore all errors except EPROBE_DEFER" [2] This fixes SYS-DMAC1 that now probes and operates without IPMMU-DS1 as expected. Same as v4.11 or earlier. With fix [1] and [2] things seem back to normal. Unless I'm mistaken it also seems that [1] allows me to drop the similar patch "[PATCH/RFC v2 1/4] iommu/of: Skip IOMMU devices disabled in DT". Thanks for your help. Cheers, / magnus [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/16/25 [2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg581485.html [3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9540605/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Magnus, <snip..> >> Magnus, do you have a suggestion? > > Thanks for your efforts guys! > > I've recently been working on up-porting the IPMMU patches and > addressing review comments. Now with my local driver stack on top of > v4.12-rc (a95cfad) I did not notice these issues initially since I > only tested devices with IPMMU enabled. Once these issues were pointed > out to me by Geert I have now reproduced the 64-bit ARM specific ones > on r8a7796 Salvator-X. > > On my r8a7796 platform I'm using the following IOMMU and DMA Engine devices: > > IOMMU device IPMMU-DS0 - Connected to SYS-DMAC0 > IOMMU device IPMMU-DS1 - Connected to SYS-DMAC1 and SYS-DMAC2 > IOMMU device IPMMU-MM - Root device serving IPMMU-DS0 and IPMMU-DS1 > > For testing the serial port SCIF1 is used with DMA Engine devices > SYS-DMAC1 or SYS-DMAC2. > > The software environment is configured as follows: > - The DTS comes with all devices above enabled except IPMMU-DS0 which > comes with status = "disabled". > - The IPMMU driver is during run time only allowing use of SYS-DMAC2. > For other devices ->of_xlate() returns -ENODEV. > > The above used to work just fine with v4.11 or earlier. > > My observations for v4.12-rc: > > 1) Default state for a95cfad > > The devices SYS-DMAC0 and SYS-DMAC1 will never probe. However SYS-DMAC2 is fine. > > 2) After applying "[PATCH] iommu: of: Fix check for returning EPROBE_DEFER" [1] > > This fixes SYS-DMAC0 that now probes and operates without IPMMU-DS0 as > expected. Same as v4.11 or earlier. > > 3) After also applying "[PATCH] of: iommu: Ignore all errors except > EPROBE_DEFER" [2] > > This fixes SYS-DMAC1 that now probes and operates without IPMMU-DS1 as > expected. Same as v4.11 or earlier. > > With fix [1] and [2] things seem back to normal. Unless I'm mistaken Thanks, will use this as your Tested-by. Regards, Sricharan > it also seems that [1] allows me to drop the similar patch "[PATCH/RFC > v2 1/4] iommu/of: Skip IOMMU devices disabled in DT". > > Thanks for your help. > > Cheers, > > / magnus > > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/16/25 > [2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg581485.html > [3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9540605/ >
--- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c @@ -196,6 +196,11 @@ static const struct iommu_ops ops = of_iommu_xlate(dev, &iommu_spec); of_node_put(iommu_spec.np); idx++; + if (PTR_ERR(ops) == -ENODEV) { + dev_info(dev, "%s: Ignoring -ENODEV => NULL\n", + __func__); + return NULL; + } if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ops)) break; }