Message ID | cc2aa18e2e6004ba099e69b41d0d505a4361443c.1571314830.git.amit.kucheria@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | Initialise thermal framework and cpufreq earlier during boot | expand |
On 17-10-19, 17:57, Amit Kucheria wrote: > Now that the thermal framework is built-in, in order to facilitate > thermal mitigation as early as possible in the boot cycle, move the > thermal framework initialization to core_initcall. > > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c > index d21b754baee2..d8251d723459 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c > @@ -1537,4 +1537,5 @@ static int __init thermal_init(void) > mutex_destroy(&poweroff_lock); > return result; > } > -fs_initcall(thermal_init); > + remove the blank line please. > +core_initcall(thermal_init); Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c index d21b754baee2..d8251d723459 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c @@ -1537,4 +1537,5 @@ static int __init thermal_init(void) mutex_destroy(&poweroff_lock); return result; } -fs_initcall(thermal_init); + +core_initcall(thermal_init);
Now that the thermal framework is built-in, in order to facilitate thermal mitigation as early as possible in the boot cycle, move the thermal framework initialization to core_initcall. Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org> --- drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)