Message ID | 158503038812.1955.7827988255138056389.stgit@buzz (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | block/diskstats: more accurate io_ticks and optimization | expand |
On 3/24/20 12:39 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > Simplified estimation for io_ticks introduced in patch > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20181206164122.2166-5-snitzer@redhat.com/ > could be very inaccurate for request longer than jiffy (i.e. any HDD) > > There is at least one another report about this: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20200324031942.GA3060@ming.t460p/ > See detail in comment for first patch. > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/155413438394.3201.15211440151043943989.stgit@buzz/ > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/158314549775.1788.6529015932237292177.stgit@buzz/ > v3: > * update documentation > * rebase to current linux-next > * fix compilation for CONFIG_SMP=n Can you respin this against my for-5.7/block branch?