Message ID | 20200203104100.16965-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | block, bfq: series of fixes, and not only, for some recently reported issues | expand |
On 03.02.2020 11:40, Paolo Valente wrote: > Hi Jens, > this the V2 of the series. The only change is the removal of ifdefs > from around gets and puts of bfq groups. As I wrote in my previous > cover letter, these patches are mostly fixes for the issues reported > in [1, 2]. All patches have been publicly tested in the dev version of > BFQ. > > Thanks, > Paolo > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767539 > [2] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205447 > > Paolo Valente (7): > block, bfq: do not plug I/O for bfq_queues with no proc refs > block, bfq: do not insert oom queue into position tree > block, bfq: get extra ref to prevent a queue from being freed during > a > group move > block, bfq: extend incomplete name of field on_st > block, bfq: remove ifdefs from around gets/puts of bfq groups > block, bfq: get a ref to a group when adding it to a service tree > block, bfq: clarify the goal of bfq_split_bfqq() > > block/bfq-cgroup.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- > block/bfq-iosched.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------ > block/bfq-iosched.h | 4 +++- > block/bfq-wf2q.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------ > 4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.20.1 Feel free to add: Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name> since I'm running v5.5 with this series applied for a couple of days already without any visible smoke.
On 2/3/20 3:40 AM, Paolo Valente wrote: > Hi Jens, > this the V2 of the series. The only change is the removal of ifdefs > from around gets and puts of bfq groups. As I wrote in my previous > cover letter, these patches are mostly fixes for the issues reported > in [1, 2]. All patches have been publicly tested in the dev version of > BFQ. I'll apply this one, at least the ifdef cleanup is nice and patch 6/7 no longer makes your eyes burn!