From patchwork Thu Sep 16 09:33:43 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yu Kuai X-Patchwork-Id: 12498403 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A09C433EF for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:24:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B343260F8F for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:24:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234268AbhIPJZX (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Sep 2021 05:25:23 -0400 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.189]:16264 "EHLO szxga03-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235219AbhIPJZX (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Sep 2021 05:25:23 -0400 Received: from dggemv704-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.53]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4H9BTQ73xtz8t83; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:23:22 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggema762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.204) by dggemv704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:24:01 +0800 Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by dggema762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.8; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:24:00 +0800 From: Yu Kuai To: , , , CC: , , , , Subject: [patch v8 0/7] handle unexpected message from server Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:33:43 +0800 Message-ID: <20210916093350.1410403-1-yukuai3@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.127.227] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To dggema762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.204) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org This patch set tries to fix that client might oops if nbd server send unexpected message to client, for example, our syzkaller report a uaf in nbd_read_stat(): Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x310 arch/arm64/kernel/time.c:78 show_stack+0x28/0x38 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:158 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x144/0x1b4 lib/dump_stack.c:118 print_address_description+0x68/0x2d0 mm/kasan/report.c:253 kasan_report_error mm/kasan/report.c:351 [inline] kasan_report+0x134/0x2f0 mm/kasan/report.c:409 check_memory_region_inline mm/kasan/kasan.c:260 [inline] __asan_load4+0x88/0xb0 mm/kasan/kasan.c:699 __read_once_size include/linux/compiler.h:193 [inline] blk_mq_rq_state block/blk-mq.h:106 [inline] blk_mq_request_started+0x24/0x40 block/blk-mq.c:644 nbd_read_stat drivers/block/nbd.c:670 [inline] recv_work+0x1bc/0x890 drivers/block/nbd.c:749 process_one_work+0x3ec/0x9e0 kernel/workqueue.c:2147 worker_thread+0x80/0x9d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2302 kthread+0x1d8/0x1e0 kernel/kthread.c:255 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:1174 1) At first, a normal io is submitted and completed with scheduler: internel_tag = blk_mq_get_tag -> get tag from sched_tags blk_mq_rq_ctx_init sched_tags->rq[internel_tag] = sched_tag->static_rq[internel_tag] ... blk_mq_get_driver_tag __blk_mq_get_driver_tag -> get tag from tags tags->rq[tag] = sched_tag->static_rq[internel_tag] So, both tags->rq[tag] and sched_tags->rq[internel_tag] are pointing to the request: sched_tags->static_rq[internal_tag]. Even if the io is finished. 2) nbd server send a reply with random tag directly: recv_work nbd_read_stat blk_mq_tag_to_rq(tags, tag) rq = tags->rq[tag] 3) if the sched_tags->static_rq is freed: blk_mq_sched_free_requests blk_mq_free_rqs(q->tag_set, hctx->sched_tags, i) -> step 2) access rq before clearing rq mapping blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping(set, tags, hctx_idx); __free_pages() -> rq is freed here 4) Then, nbd continue to use the freed request in nbd_read_stat() Changes in v8: - add patch 5 to this series. - modify some words. Changes in v7: - instead of exposing blk_queue_exit(), using percpu_ref_put() directly. - drop the ref right after nbd_handle_reply(). Changes in v6: - don't set cmd->status to error if request is completed before nbd_clear_req(). - get 'q_usage_counter' to prevent accessing freed request through blk_mq_tag_to_rq(), instead of using blk_mq_find_and_get_req(). Changes in v5: - move patch 1 & 2 in v4 (patch 4 & 5 in v5) behind - add some comment in patch 5 Changes in v4: - change the name of the patchset, since uaf is not the only problem if server send unexpected reply message. - instead of adding new interface, use blk_mq_find_and_get_req(). - add patch 5 to this series Changes in v3: - v2 can't fix the problem thoroughly, add patch 3-4 to this series. - modify descriptions. - patch 5 is just a cleanup Changes in v2: - as Bart suggested, add a new helper function for drivers to get request by tag. Yu Kuai (7): nbd: don't handle response without a corresponding request message nbd: make sure request completion won't concurrent nbd: check sock index in nbd_read_stat() nbd: don't start request if nbd_queue_rq() failed nbd: clean up return value checking of sock_xmit() nbd: partition nbd_read_stat() into nbd_read_reply() and nbd_handle_reply() nbd: fix uaf in nbd_handle_reply() drivers/block/nbd.c | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik