Message ID | 20221021174116.7200-1-logang@deltatee.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Userspace P2PDMA with O_DIRECT NVMe devices | expand |
The series looks good to me know. How do we want to handle it? I think we need a special branch somewhere (maybe in the block or mm trees?) so that we can base the other iov_iter work from John on it. Also Al has a whole bunch of iov_iter changes that we probably want on the same branch as well, although some of those (READ vs WRITE fixups) look like 6.1 material to me.
On 10/24/22 08:03, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The series looks good to me know. How do we want to handle it? I think > we need a special branch somewhere (maybe in the block or mm trees?) > so that we can base the other iov_iter work from John on it. Also > Al has a whole bunch of iov_iter changes that we probably want on > the same branch as well, although some of those (READ vs WRITE fixups) > look like 6.1 material to me. > A little earlier, Jens graciously offered [1] to provide a topic branch, such as: for-6.2/block-gup [2] (I've moved the name forward from 6.1 to 6.2, because that discussion was 7 weeks ago.) [1] https://lore.kernel.org/ae675a01-90e6-4af1-6c43-660b3a6c7b72@kernel.dk [2] https://lore.kernel.org/55a2d67f-9a12-9fe6-d73b-8c3f5eb36f31@kernel.dk thanks,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 12:15:56PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote: > A little earlier, Jens graciously offered [1] to provide a topic branch, > such as: > > for-6.2/block-gup [2] > > (I've moved the name forward from 6.1 to 6.2, because that discussion > was 7 weeks ago.) So what are we going to do with this series? It would be sad to miss the merge window again.
@add Jens On 2022-11-07 23:56, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 12:15:56PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote: >> A little earlier, Jens graciously offered [1] to provide a topic branch, >> such as: >> >> for-6.2/block-gup [2] >> >> (I've moved the name forward from 6.1 to 6.2, because that discussion >> was 7 weeks ago.) > > So what are we going to do with this series? It would be sad to miss > the merge window again. I noticed Jens wasn't copied on this series. I've added him. It would be nice to get this in someone's tree soon. Thanks! Logan
On 11/9/22 10:28 AM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > @add Jens > > On 2022-11-07 23:56, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 12:15:56PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote: >>> A little earlier, Jens graciously offered [1] to provide a topic branch, >>> such as: >>> >>> for-6.2/block-gup [2] >>> >>> (I've moved the name forward from 6.1 to 6.2, because that discussion >>> was 7 weeks ago.) >> >> So what are we going to do with this series? It would be sad to miss >> the merge window again. > > I noticed Jens wasn't copied on this series. I've added him. It would be > nice to get this in someone's tree soon. I took a look and the series looks fine to me.