Message ID | 1465389066-19119-2-git-send-email-hch@lst.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> writes: > Just for book keeping. The next patch brings it back with some changes. That's a strange thing to do, and breaks bisectability. Why not just update the function? -Jeff > > This reverts commit 98878e0f0b80520575b31147f7cff28e28d9a725. > --- > block/blk-mq.c | 33 --------------------------------- > include/linux/blk-mq.h | 2 -- > 2 files changed, 35 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c > index 049356d..13f4603 100644 > --- a/block/blk-mq.c > +++ b/block/blk-mq.c > @@ -267,39 +267,6 @@ struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request(struct request_queue *q, int rw, > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_alloc_request); > > -struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx(struct request_queue *q, int rw, > - unsigned int flags, unsigned int hctx_idx) > -{ > - struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx; > - struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx; > - struct request *rq; > - struct blk_mq_alloc_data alloc_data; > - int ret; > - > - ret = blk_queue_enter(q, flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT); > - if (ret) > - return ERR_PTR(ret); > - > - hctx = q->queue_hw_ctx[hctx_idx]; > - ctx = __blk_mq_get_ctx(q, cpumask_first(hctx->cpumask)); > - > - blk_mq_set_alloc_data(&alloc_data, q, flags, ctx, hctx); > - > - rq = __blk_mq_alloc_request(&alloc_data, rw); > - if (!rq && !(flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT)) { > - __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx); > - > - rq = __blk_mq_alloc_request(&alloc_data, rw); > - } > - if (!rq) { > - blk_queue_exit(q); > - return ERR_PTR(-EWOULDBLOCK); > - } > - > - return rq; > -} > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx); > - > static void __blk_mq_free_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, > struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx, struct request *rq) > { > diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h > index 9a5d581..faa7d5c2 100644 > --- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h > +++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h > @@ -198,8 +198,6 @@ enum { > > struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request(struct request_queue *q, int rw, > unsigned int flags); > -struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx(struct request_queue *q, int rw, > - unsigned int flags, unsigned int hctx_idx); > struct request *blk_mq_tag_to_rq(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, unsigned int tag); > struct cpumask *blk_mq_tags_cpumask(struct blk_mq_tags *tags); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:58:38AM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> writes: > > > Just for book keeping. The next patch brings it back with some changes. > > That's a strange thing to do, and breaks bisectability. Why not just > update the function? Because it's just an updated to a not yet applied series. The idea is that Jens could just take patch 2 if we get a positive review or two for it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> writes: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:58:38AM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: >> Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> writes: >> >> > Just for book keeping. The next patch brings it back with some changes. >> >> That's a strange thing to do, and breaks bisectability. Why not just >> update the function? > > Because it's just an updated to a not yet applied series. The idea is > that Jens could just take patch 2 if we get a positive review or two for > it. Ah, gotcha. Thanks for the clarification. -Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c index 049356d..13f4603 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq.c +++ b/block/blk-mq.c @@ -267,39 +267,6 @@ struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request(struct request_queue *q, int rw, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_alloc_request); -struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx(struct request_queue *q, int rw, - unsigned int flags, unsigned int hctx_idx) -{ - struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx; - struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx; - struct request *rq; - struct blk_mq_alloc_data alloc_data; - int ret; - - ret = blk_queue_enter(q, flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT); - if (ret) - return ERR_PTR(ret); - - hctx = q->queue_hw_ctx[hctx_idx]; - ctx = __blk_mq_get_ctx(q, cpumask_first(hctx->cpumask)); - - blk_mq_set_alloc_data(&alloc_data, q, flags, ctx, hctx); - - rq = __blk_mq_alloc_request(&alloc_data, rw); - if (!rq && !(flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT)) { - __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx); - - rq = __blk_mq_alloc_request(&alloc_data, rw); - } - if (!rq) { - blk_queue_exit(q); - return ERR_PTR(-EWOULDBLOCK); - } - - return rq; -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx); - static void __blk_mq_free_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx, struct request *rq) { diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h index 9a5d581..faa7d5c2 100644 --- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h +++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h @@ -198,8 +198,6 @@ enum { struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request(struct request_queue *q, int rw, unsigned int flags); -struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx(struct request_queue *q, int rw, - unsigned int flags, unsigned int hctx_idx); struct request *blk_mq_tag_to_rq(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, unsigned int tag); struct cpumask *blk_mq_tags_cpumask(struct blk_mq_tags *tags);