Message ID | 1484778075-25065-1-git-send-email-keith.busch@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 01/18/2017 02:16 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 01/18/2017 02:21 PM, Keith Busch wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> >> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> >> Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> > > Does it cause a warning anywhere? If not, I'd rather not apply > it, since it'll cause a merge conflict for 4.11 (and the problem > doesn't exist there). Ah screw it, the fact that we have that in 4.10 is an eye sore. I'd rather deal with the conflict, I'll apply it for 4.10. Thanks Keith.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 02:21:48PM -0800, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 01/18/2017 02:16 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On 01/18/2017 02:21 PM, Keith Busch wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> > >> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > >> Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> > > > > Does it cause a warning anywhere? If not, I'd rather not apply > > it, since it'll cause a merge conflict for 4.11 (and the problem > > doesn't exist there). > > Ah screw it, the fact that we have that in 4.10 is an eye sore. > I'd rather deal with the conflict, I'll apply it for 4.10. Thanks > Keith. Okay, thanks. I was just clearing my backlog of emails and this was on my todo list from a couple weeks ago, but I didn't noticed 4.11 corrected this in the mq scheduler set. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c index a8e67a1..c3400b5 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq.c +++ b/block/blk-mq.c @@ -912,7 +912,6 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct list_head *list) static void blk_mq_process_rq_list(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) { LIST_HEAD(rq_list); - LIST_HEAD(driver_list); if (unlikely(blk_mq_hctx_stopped(hctx))) return;