From patchwork Mon Jun 26 12:10:01 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ming Lei X-Patchwork-Id: 9809487 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D80C60209 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B75274D1 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 3964828582; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:28:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F68274D1 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752625AbdFZMQD (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2017 08:16:03 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41078 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752155AbdFZMPr (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2017 08:15:47 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9AD181240; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:15:46 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com D9AD181240 Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ming.lei@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com D9AD181240 Received: from localhost (ovpn-12-86.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.86]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8B87EA4F; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:15:40 +0000 (UTC) From: Ming Lei To: Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Huang Ying , Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Ming Lei Subject: [PATCH v2 18/51] block: bounce: don't access bio->bi_io_vec in copy_to_high_bio_irq Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 20:10:01 +0800 Message-Id: <20170626121034.3051-19-ming.lei@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20170626121034.3051-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> References: <20170626121034.3051-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]); Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP As we need to support multipage bvecs, so don't access bio->bi_io_vec in copy_to_high_bio_irq(), and just use the standard iterator to do that. Signed-off-by: Ming Lei --- block/bounce.c | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/bounce.c b/block/bounce.c index 4eea1b2d8618..590dcdb1de76 100644 --- a/block/bounce.c +++ b/block/bounce.c @@ -111,24 +111,30 @@ int init_emergency_isa_pool(void) static void copy_to_high_bio_irq(struct bio *to, struct bio *from) { unsigned char *vfrom; - struct bio_vec tovec, *fromvec = from->bi_io_vec; + struct bio_vec tovec, fromvec; struct bvec_iter iter; + /* + * The bio of @from is created by bounce, so we can iterate + * its bvec from start to end, but the @from->bi_iter can't be + * trusted because it might be changed by splitting. + */ + struct bvec_iter from_iter = BVEC_ITER_ALL_INIT; bio_for_each_segment(tovec, to, iter) { - if (tovec.bv_page != fromvec->bv_page) { + fromvec = bio_iter_iovec(from, from_iter); + if (tovec.bv_page != fromvec.bv_page) { /* * fromvec->bv_offset and fromvec->bv_len might have * been modified by the block layer, so use the original * copy, bounce_copy_vec already uses tovec->bv_len */ - vfrom = page_address(fromvec->bv_page) + + vfrom = page_address(fromvec.bv_page) + tovec.bv_offset; bounce_copy_vec(&tovec, vfrom); flush_dcache_page(tovec.bv_page); } - - fromvec++; + bio_advance_iter(from, &from_iter, tovec.bv_len); } }