From patchwork Mon Jun 26 12:10:06 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ming Lei X-Patchwork-Id: 9809469 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15D060209 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:27:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7B43274D1 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:27:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id AC80C28582; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:27:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63EDB274D1 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:27:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752687AbdFZMQq (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2017 08:16:46 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58412 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752390AbdFZMQo (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2017 08:16:44 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 097AC19D375; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:16:39 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 097AC19D375 Authentication-Results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ming.lei@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 097AC19D375 Received: from localhost (ovpn-12-86.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.86]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCFC5F90D; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:16:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Ming Lei To: Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Huang Ying , Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Ming Lei Subject: [PATCH v2 23/51] blk-merge: compute bio->bi_seg_front_size efficiently Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 20:10:06 +0800 Message-Id: <20170626121034.3051-24-ming.lei@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20170626121034.3051-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> References: <20170626121034.3051-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:16:39 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP It is enough to check and compute bio->bi_seg_front_size just after the 1st segment is found, but current code checks that for each bvec, which is inefficient. This patch follows the way in __blk_recalc_rq_segments() for computing bio->bi_seg_front_size, and it is more efficient and code becomes more readable too. Signed-off-by: Ming Lei --- block/blk-merge.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c index 5df13041b851..821b9c206308 100644 --- a/block/blk-merge.c +++ b/block/blk-merge.c @@ -145,22 +145,21 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q, bvprvp = &bvprv; sectors += bv.bv_len >> 9; - if (nsegs == 1 && seg_size > front_seg_size) - front_seg_size = seg_size; continue; } new_segment: if (nsegs == queue_max_segments(q)) goto split; + if (nsegs == 1 && seg_size > front_seg_size) + front_seg_size = seg_size; + nsegs++; bvprv = bv; bvprvp = &bvprv; seg_size = bv.bv_len; sectors += bv.bv_len >> 9; - if (nsegs == 1 && seg_size > front_seg_size) - front_seg_size = seg_size; } do_split = false; @@ -173,6 +172,8 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q, bio = new; } + if (nsegs == 1 && seg_size > front_seg_size) + front_seg_size = seg_size; bio->bi_seg_front_size = front_seg_size; if (seg_size > bio->bi_seg_back_size) bio->bi_seg_back_size = seg_size;