From patchwork Thu Dec 21 06:43:39 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Damien Le Moal X-Patchwork-Id: 10126987 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76AA6056F for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 06:44:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC42E28905 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 06:44:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id D0F8629612; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 06:44:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A1C28905 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 06:44:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751406AbdLUGoV (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Dec 2017 01:44:21 -0500 Received: from esa3.hgst.iphmx.com ([216.71.153.141]:12054 "EHLO esa3.hgst.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751163AbdLUGoT (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Dec 2017 01:44:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=wdc.com; i=@wdc.com; q=dns/txt; s=dkim.wdc.com; t=1513838659; x=1545374659; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references; bh=rbpRoLkKDxCPe5M22glajSTZbRpkkGaz0vK38V/h7EM=; b=jCK2r1Awa/Fxor/Zs4m9XYB3ksx9zkNUNSQkgWayW6Fu8BJvUMkzXibm AYWnMoxG/HNYkINngAbhEoEYoOHBdyPTGZGI+iU09P88uE6YlQhP44Cb2 JY4rohFmystgRxXEl/o9RmZbqi08gz6pUKHvwW0Rfnx1lEgDO5GA8qnIT RNUS5RDWT9T7aWYEQXIpyaVwwa0m/rE7yrZXCGHWNUNQn3w3xDLcEWbko hnn7Rrq9kFDWWKF+qWShhcmvX9feagncJz2XUlX1s5ssuWqe+SMxjWzZ9 RRxmIiZhib1aLQ/Szg5Zn+Nmc6OBqdAKlPFAzhfrTmAOz8f6RYkBsck7h g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,434,1508774400"; d="scan'208";a="66300988" Received: from h199-255-45-15.hgst.com (HELO uls-op-cesaep02.wdc.com) ([199.255.45.15]) by ob1.hgst.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 21 Dec 2017 14:44:19 +0800 Received: from uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com ([10.248.3.37]) by uls-op-cesaep02.wdc.com with ESMTP; 20 Dec 2017 22:40:31 -0800 Received: from washi.fujisawa.hgst.com ([10.149.53.254]) by uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com with ESMTP; 20 Dec 2017 22:44:18 -0800 From: Damien Le Moal To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "Martin K . Petersen" , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Bart Van Assche Subject: [PATCH V9 2/7] mq-deadline: Introduce dispatch helpers Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:43:39 +0900 Message-Id: <20171221064344.6228-3-damien.lemoal@wdc.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.3 In-Reply-To: <20171221064344.6228-1-damien.lemoal@wdc.com> References: <20171221064344.6228-1-damien.lemoal@wdc.com> Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Avoid directly referencing the next_rq and fifo_list arrays using the helper functions deadline_next_request() and deadline_fifo_request() to facilitate changes in the dispatch request selection in __dd_dispatch_request() for zoned block devices. Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen --- block/mq-deadline.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/mq-deadline.c b/block/mq-deadline.c index 0179e484ec98..8bd6db9e69c7 100644 --- a/block/mq-deadline.c +++ b/block/mq-deadline.c @@ -191,6 +191,35 @@ static inline int deadline_check_fifo(struct deadline_data *dd, int ddir) return 0; } +/* + * For the specified data direction, return the next request to + * dispatch using arrival ordered lists. + */ +static struct request * +deadline_fifo_request(struct deadline_data *dd, int data_dir) +{ + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(data_dir != READ && data_dir != WRITE)) + return NULL; + + if (list_empty(&dd->fifo_list[data_dir])) + return NULL; + + return rq_entry_fifo(dd->fifo_list[data_dir].next); +} + +/* + * For the specified data direction, return the next request to + * dispatch using sector position sorted lists. + */ +static struct request * +deadline_next_request(struct deadline_data *dd, int data_dir) +{ + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(data_dir != READ && data_dir != WRITE)) + return NULL; + + return dd->next_rq[data_dir]; +} + /* * deadline_dispatch_requests selects the best request according to * read/write expire, fifo_batch, etc @@ -198,7 +227,7 @@ static inline int deadline_check_fifo(struct deadline_data *dd, int ddir) static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) { struct deadline_data *dd = hctx->queue->elevator->elevator_data; - struct request *rq; + struct request *rq, *next_rq; bool reads, writes; int data_dir; @@ -214,10 +243,9 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) /* * batches are currently reads XOR writes */ - if (dd->next_rq[WRITE]) - rq = dd->next_rq[WRITE]; - else - rq = dd->next_rq[READ]; + rq = deadline_next_request(dd, WRITE); + if (!rq) + rq = deadline_next_request(dd, READ); if (rq && dd->batching < dd->fifo_batch) /* we have a next request are still entitled to batch */ @@ -260,19 +288,20 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) /* * we are not running a batch, find best request for selected data_dir */ - if (deadline_check_fifo(dd, data_dir) || !dd->next_rq[data_dir]) { + next_rq = deadline_next_request(dd, data_dir); + if (deadline_check_fifo(dd, data_dir) || !next_rq) { /* * A deadline has expired, the last request was in the other * direction, or we have run out of higher-sectored requests. * Start again from the request with the earliest expiry time. */ - rq = rq_entry_fifo(dd->fifo_list[data_dir].next); + rq = deadline_fifo_request(dd, data_dir); } else { /* * The last req was the same dir and we have a next request in * sort order. No expired requests so continue on from here. */ - rq = dd->next_rq[data_dir]; + rq = next_rq; } dd->batching = 0;