From patchwork Sat May 5 13:04:45 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Coly Li X-Patchwork-Id: 10382139 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3B560353 for ; Sat, 5 May 2018 13:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B41829476 for ; Sat, 5 May 2018 13:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 0BB3C29495; Sat, 5 May 2018 13:04:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DAF029476 for ; Sat, 5 May 2018 13:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751118AbeEENE5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 May 2018 09:04:57 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51807 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751157AbeEENE4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 May 2018 09:04:56 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC52AE80; Sat, 5 May 2018 13:04:55 +0000 (UTC) From: Coly Li To: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Coly Li Subject: [PATCH] bcache: display rate debug parameters to 0 when writeback is not running Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 21:04:45 +0800 Message-Id: <20180505130445.73214-1-colyli@suse.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.3 Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP When writeback is not running, writeback rate should be 0, other value is misleading. And the following dyanmic writeback rate debug parameters should be 0 too, rate, proportional, integral, change otherwise they are misleading when writeback is not running. Signed-off-by: Coly Li --- drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c b/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c index dfeef583ee50..6ef6616fb76e 100644 --- a/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ SHOW(__bch_cached_dev) struct cached_dev *dc = container_of(kobj, struct cached_dev, disk.kobj); const char *states[] = { "no cache", "clean", "dirty", "inconsistent" }; + int wb = dc->writeback_running; #define var(stat) (dc->stat) @@ -140,7 +141,7 @@ SHOW(__bch_cached_dev) var_printf(writeback_running, "%i"); var_print(writeback_delay); var_print(writeback_percent); - sysfs_hprint(writeback_rate, dc->writeback_rate.rate << 9); + sysfs_hprint(writeback_rate, wb ? dc->writeback_rate.rate << 9 : 0); sysfs_hprint(io_errors, atomic_read(&dc->io_errors)); sysfs_printf(io_error_limit, "%i", dc->error_limit); sysfs_printf(io_disable, "%i", dc->io_disable); @@ -158,15 +159,20 @@ SHOW(__bch_cached_dev) char change[20]; s64 next_io; - bch_hprint(rate, dc->writeback_rate.rate << 9); - bch_hprint(dirty, bcache_dev_sectors_dirty(&dc->disk) << 9); - bch_hprint(target, dc->writeback_rate_target << 9); - bch_hprint(proportional,dc->writeback_rate_proportional << 9); - bch_hprint(integral, dc->writeback_rate_integral_scaled << 9); - bch_hprint(change, dc->writeback_rate_change << 9); - - next_io = div64_s64(dc->writeback_rate.next - local_clock(), - NSEC_PER_MSEC); + /* + * Except for dirty and target, other values should + * be 0 if writeback is not running. + */ + bch_hprint(rate, wb ? dc->writeback_rate.rate << 9 : 0); + bch_hprint(dirty, bcache_dev_sectors_dirty(&dc->disk) << 9); + bch_hprint(target, dc->writeback_rate_target << 9); + bch_hprint(proportional, + wb ? dc->writeback_rate_proportional << 9 : 0); + bch_hprint(integral, + wb ? dc->writeback_rate_integral_scaled << 9 : 0); + bch_hprint(change, wb ? dc->writeback_rate_change << 9 : 0); + next_io = wb ? div64_s64(dc->writeback_rate.next-local_clock(), + NSEC_PER_MSEC) : 0; return sprintf(buf, "rate:\t\t%s/sec\n"