@@ -956,7 +956,8 @@ int blk_queue_enter(struct request_queue *q, blk_mq_req_flags_t flags)
wait_event(q->mq_freeze_wq,
(atomic_read(&q->mq_freeze_depth) == 0 &&
- (pm || !blk_queue_pm_only(q))) ||
+ (pm || (blk_pm_request_resume(q),
+ !blk_queue_pm_only(q)))) ||
blk_queue_dying(q));
if (blk_queue_dying(q))
return -ENODEV;
@@ -601,7 +601,6 @@ void __elv_add_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq, int where)
trace_block_rq_insert(q, rq);
blk_pm_add_request(q, rq);
- blk_pm_request_resume(q);
rq->q = q;
Instead of scheduling runtime resume of a request queue after a request has been queued, schedule asynchronous resume during request allocation. The new pm_request_resume() calls occur after blk_queue_enter() has increased the q_usage_counter request queue member. This change is needed for a later patch that will make request allocation block while the queue status is not RPM_ACTIVE. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Cc: Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> --- block/blk-core.c | 3 ++- block/elevator.c | 1 - 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)