Message ID | 20190123190557.118894-1-bvanassche@acm.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | blk-wbt: Declare local functions static | expand |
Looks good. Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com> From: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org <linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org> on behalf of Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 11:05 AM To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org; Christoph Hellwig; Bart Van Assche Subject: [PATCH] blk-wbt: Declare local functions static This patch avoids that sparse reports the following warnings: CHECK block/blk-wbt.c block/blk-wbt.c:600:6: warning: symbol 'wbt_issue' was not declared. Should it be static? block/blk-wbt.c:620:6: warning: symbol 'wbt_requeue' was not declared. Should it be static? CC block/blk-wbt.o block/blk-wbt.c:600:6: warning: no previous prototype for wbt_issue [-Wmissing-prototypes] void wbt_issue(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq) ^~~~~~~~~ block/blk-wbt.c:620:6: warning: no previous prototype for wbt_requeue [-Wmissing-prototypes] void wbt_requeue(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq) ^~~~~~~~~~~ Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> --- block/blk-wbt.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-wbt.c b/block/blk-wbt.c index f0c56649775f..fd166fbb0f65 100644 --- a/block/blk-wbt.c +++ b/block/blk-wbt.c @@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ static void wbt_track(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq, struct bio *bio) rq->wbt_flags |= bio_to_wbt_flags(rwb, bio); } -void wbt_issue(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq) +static void wbt_issue(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq) { struct rq_wb *rwb = RQWB(rqos); @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ void wbt_issue(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq) } } -void wbt_requeue(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq) +static void wbt_requeue(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq) { struct rq_wb *rwb = RQWB(rqos); if (!rwb_enabled(rwb))
On 1/23/19 12:05 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > This patch avoids that sparse reports the following warnings: > > CHECK block/blk-wbt.c > block/blk-wbt.c:600:6: warning: symbol 'wbt_issue' was not declared. Should it be static? > block/blk-wbt.c:620:6: warning: symbol 'wbt_requeue' was not declared. Should it be static? > CC block/blk-wbt.o > block/blk-wbt.c:600:6: warning: no previous prototype for wbt_issue [-Wmissing-prototypes] > void wbt_issue(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq) > ^~~~~~~~~ > block/blk-wbt.c:620:6: warning: no previous prototype for wbt_requeue [-Wmissing-prototypes] > void wbt_requeue(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq) Thanks Bart, applied.
diff --git a/block/blk-wbt.c b/block/blk-wbt.c index f0c56649775f..fd166fbb0f65 100644 --- a/block/blk-wbt.c +++ b/block/blk-wbt.c @@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ static void wbt_track(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq, struct bio *bio) rq->wbt_flags |= bio_to_wbt_flags(rwb, bio); } -void wbt_issue(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq) +static void wbt_issue(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq) { struct rq_wb *rwb = RQWB(rqos); @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ void wbt_issue(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq) } } -void wbt_requeue(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq) +static void wbt_requeue(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq) { struct rq_wb *rwb = RQWB(rqos); if (!rwb_enabled(rwb))
This patch avoids that sparse reports the following warnings: CHECK block/blk-wbt.c block/blk-wbt.c:600:6: warning: symbol 'wbt_issue' was not declared. Should it be static? block/blk-wbt.c:620:6: warning: symbol 'wbt_requeue' was not declared. Should it be static? CC block/blk-wbt.o block/blk-wbt.c:600:6: warning: no previous prototype for wbt_issue [-Wmissing-prototypes] void wbt_issue(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq) ^~~~~~~~~ block/blk-wbt.c:620:6: warning: no previous prototype for wbt_requeue [-Wmissing-prototypes] void wbt_requeue(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq) ^~~~~~~~~~~ Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> --- block/blk-wbt.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)