| Message ID | 20200519112936.928185-1-danil.kipnis@cloud.ionos.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2] rtrs-clt: silence kbuild test inconsistent intenting smatch warning | expand |
On 2020-05-19 04:29, Danil Kipnis wrote: > Kbuild test robot reports a smatch warning: > drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c:1196 rtrs_clt_failover_req() warn: inconsistent indenting > drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c:2890 rtrs_clt_request() warn: inconsistent indenting > > To get rid of the warning, move the while_each_path() macro to a newline. > Rename the macro to end_each_path() to avoid the "while should follow close > brace '}'" checkpatch error. > > Fixes: 6a98d71daea1 ("RDMA/rtrs: client: main functionality") > > Signed-off-by: Danil Kipnis <danil.kipnis@cloud.ionos.com> > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> > --- > v1->v2 Add fixes line > drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c > index 468fdd0d8713..0fa3a229d90e 100644 > --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c > @@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ struct path_it { > (it)->i < (it)->clt->paths_num; \ > (it)->i++) > > -#define while_each_path(it) \ > +#define end_each_path(it) \ > path_it_deinit(it); \ > rcu_read_unlock(); \ > } > @@ -1193,7 +1193,8 @@ static int rtrs_clt_failover_req(struct rtrs_clt *clt, > /* Success path */ > rtrs_clt_inc_failover_cnt(alive_sess->stats); > break; > - } while_each_path(&it); > + } > + end_each_path(&it); > > return err; > } > @@ -2887,7 +2888,8 @@ int rtrs_clt_request(int dir, struct rtrs_clt_req_ops *ops, > } > /* Success path */ > break; > - } while_each_path(&it); > + } > + end_each_path(&it); > > return err; > } I don't like the do_each_path() and end_each_path() macros because these do not follow the pattern that is used elsewhere in the kernel to use a single macro to iterate over a custom container. Has it been considered to combine these two macros into a single macro, e.g. something like the following (untested) patch? Subject: [PATCH] Combine while_each_path() and do_each_path() into for_each_path() --- drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c | 23 +++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c index 468fdd0d8713..8dfa56dc32bc 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c @@ -727,18 +727,13 @@ struct path_it { struct rtrs_clt_sess *(*next_path)(struct path_it *it); }; -#define do_each_path(path, clt, it) { \ - path_it_init(it, clt); \ - rcu_read_lock(); \ - for ((it)->i = 0; ((path) = ((it)->next_path)(it)) && \ - (it)->i < (it)->clt->paths_num; \ +#define for_each_path(path, clt, it) \ + for (path_it_init((it), (clt)), rcu_read_lock(), (it)->i = 0; \ + (((path) = ((it)->next_path)(it)) && \ + (it)->i < (it)->clt->paths_num) || \ + (path_it_deinit(it), rcu_read_unlock(), 0); \ (it)->i++) -#define while_each_path(it) \ - path_it_deinit(it); \ - rcu_read_unlock(); \ - } - /** * list_next_or_null_rr_rcu - get next list element in round-robin fashion. * @head: the head for the list. @@ -1177,7 +1172,7 @@ static int rtrs_clt_failover_req(struct rtrs_clt *clt, int err = -ECONNABORTED; struct path_it it; - do_each_path(alive_sess, clt, &it) { + for_each_path(alive_sess, clt, &it) { if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(alive_sess->state) != RTRS_CLT_CONNECTED)) continue; @@ -1193,7 +1188,7 @@ static int rtrs_clt_failover_req(struct rtrs_clt *clt, /* Success path */ rtrs_clt_inc_failover_cnt(alive_sess->stats); break; - } while_each_path(&it); + } return err; } @@ -2862,7 +2857,7 @@ int rtrs_clt_request(int dir, struct rtrs_clt_req_ops *ops, dma_dir = DMA_TO_DEVICE; } - do_each_path(sess, clt, &it) { + for_each_path(sess, clt, &it) { if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(sess->state) != RTRS_CLT_CONNECTED)) continue; @@ -2887,7 +2882,7 @@ int rtrs_clt_request(int dir, struct rtrs_clt_req_ops *ops, } /* Success path */ break; - } while_each_path(&it); + } return err; }
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 07:29:15AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c > index 468fdd0d8713..8dfa56dc32bc 100644 > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c > @@ -727,18 +727,13 @@ struct path_it { > struct rtrs_clt_sess *(*next_path)(struct path_it *it); > }; > > -#define do_each_path(path, clt, it) { \ > - path_it_init(it, clt); \ > - rcu_read_lock(); \ > - for ((it)->i = 0; ((path) = ((it)->next_path)(it)) && \ > - (it)->i < (it)->clt->paths_num; \ > +#define for_each_path(path, clt, it) \ > + for (path_it_init((it), (clt)), rcu_read_lock(), (it)->i = 0; \ > + (((path) = ((it)->next_path)(it)) && \ > + (it)->i < (it)->clt->paths_num) || \ > + (path_it_deinit(it), rcu_read_unlock(), 0); \ > (it)->i++) That is nicer, even better to write it with some inlines.. Jason
Hi Bart, On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 4:29 PM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> wrote: > > On 2020-05-19 04:29, Danil Kipnis wrote: > > Kbuild test robot reports a smatch warning: > > drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c:1196 rtrs_clt_failover_req() warn: inconsistent indenting > > drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c:2890 rtrs_clt_request() warn: inconsistent indenting > > > > To get rid of the warning, move the while_each_path() macro to a newline. > > Rename the macro to end_each_path() to avoid the "while should follow close > > brace '}'" checkpatch error. > > > > Fixes: 6a98d71daea1 ("RDMA/rtrs: client: main functionality") > > > > Signed-off-by: Danil Kipnis <danil.kipnis@cloud.ionos.com> > > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > --- > > v1->v2 Add fixes line > > drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c | 8 +++++--- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c > > index 468fdd0d8713..0fa3a229d90e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c > > @@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ struct path_it { > > (it)->i < (it)->clt->paths_num; \ > > (it)->i++) > > > > -#define while_each_path(it) \ > > +#define end_each_path(it) \ > > path_it_deinit(it); \ > > rcu_read_unlock(); \ > > } > > @@ -1193,7 +1193,8 @@ static int rtrs_clt_failover_req(struct rtrs_clt *clt, > > /* Success path */ > > rtrs_clt_inc_failover_cnt(alive_sess->stats); > > break; > > - } while_each_path(&it); > > + } > > + end_each_path(&it); > > > > return err; > > } > > @@ -2887,7 +2888,8 @@ int rtrs_clt_request(int dir, struct rtrs_clt_req_ops *ops, > > } > > /* Success path */ > > break; > > - } while_each_path(&it); > > + } > > + end_each_path(&it); > > > > return err; > > } > > I don't like the do_each_path() and end_each_path() macros because these do not > follow the pattern that is used elsewhere in the kernel to use a single macro > to iterate over a custom container. Has it been considered to combine these two > macros into a single macro, e.g. something like the following (untested) patch? > > > Subject: [PATCH] Combine while_each_path() and do_each_path() into > for_each_path() > > --- > drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c | 23 +++++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c > index 468fdd0d8713..8dfa56dc32bc 100644 > --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c > @@ -727,18 +727,13 @@ struct path_it { > struct rtrs_clt_sess *(*next_path)(struct path_it *it); > }; > > -#define do_each_path(path, clt, it) { \ > - path_it_init(it, clt); \ > - rcu_read_lock(); \ > - for ((it)->i = 0; ((path) = ((it)->next_path)(it)) && \ > - (it)->i < (it)->clt->paths_num; \ > +#define for_each_path(path, clt, it) \ > + for (path_it_init((it), (clt)), rcu_read_lock(), (it)->i = 0; \ > + (((path) = ((it)->next_path)(it)) && \ > + (it)->i < (it)->clt->paths_num) || \ > + (path_it_deinit(it), rcu_read_unlock(), 0); \ > (it)->i++) > > -#define while_each_path(it) \ > - path_it_deinit(it); \ > - rcu_read_unlock(); \ > - } > - > /** > * list_next_or_null_rr_rcu - get next list element in round-robin fashion. > * @head: the head for the list. > @@ -1177,7 +1172,7 @@ static int rtrs_clt_failover_req(struct rtrs_clt *clt, > int err = -ECONNABORTED; > struct path_it it; > > - do_each_path(alive_sess, clt, &it) { > + for_each_path(alive_sess, clt, &it) { > if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(alive_sess->state) != > RTRS_CLT_CONNECTED)) > continue; > @@ -1193,7 +1188,7 @@ static int rtrs_clt_failover_req(struct rtrs_clt *clt, > /* Success path */ > rtrs_clt_inc_failover_cnt(alive_sess->stats); > break; > - } while_each_path(&it); > + } > > return err; > } > @@ -2862,7 +2857,7 @@ int rtrs_clt_request(int dir, struct rtrs_clt_req_ops *ops, > dma_dir = DMA_TO_DEVICE; > } > > - do_each_path(sess, clt, &it) { > + for_each_path(sess, clt, &it) { > if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(sess->state) != RTRS_CLT_CONNECTED)) > continue; > > @@ -2887,7 +2882,7 @@ int rtrs_clt_request(int dir, struct rtrs_clt_req_ops *ops, > } > /* Success path */ > break; > - } while_each_path(&it); > + } > > return err; > } This does look better. Will run it through tests.
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 1:38 AM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> wrote: > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 07:29:15AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c > > index 468fdd0d8713..8dfa56dc32bc 100644 > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c > > @@ -727,18 +727,13 @@ struct path_it { > > struct rtrs_clt_sess *(*next_path)(struct path_it *it); > > }; > > > > -#define do_each_path(path, clt, it) { \ > > - path_it_init(it, clt); \ > > - rcu_read_lock(); \ > > - for ((it)->i = 0; ((path) = ((it)->next_path)(it)) && \ > > - (it)->i < (it)->clt->paths_num; \ > > +#define for_each_path(path, clt, it) \ > > + for (path_it_init((it), (clt)), rcu_read_lock(), (it)->i = 0; \ > > + (((path) = ((it)->next_path)(it)) && \ > > + (it)->i < (it)->clt->paths_num) || \ > > + (path_it_deinit(it), rcu_read_unlock(), 0); \ > > (it)->i++) > > That is nicer, even better to write it with some inlines.. You mean pass a callback to an inline function that would iterate? > > Jason
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 12:04:28PM +0200, Danil Kipnis wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 1:38 AM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 07:29:15AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c > > > index 468fdd0d8713..8dfa56dc32bc 100644 > > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c > > > @@ -727,18 +727,13 @@ struct path_it { > > > struct rtrs_clt_sess *(*next_path)(struct path_it *it); > > > }; > > > > > > -#define do_each_path(path, clt, it) { \ > > > - path_it_init(it, clt); \ > > > - rcu_read_lock(); \ > > > - for ((it)->i = 0; ((path) = ((it)->next_path)(it)) && \ > > > - (it)->i < (it)->clt->paths_num; \ > > > +#define for_each_path(path, clt, it) \ > > > + for (path_it_init((it), (clt)), rcu_read_lock(), (it)->i = 0; \ > > > + (((path) = ((it)->next_path)(it)) && \ > > > + (it)->i < (it)->clt->paths_num) || \ > > > + (path_it_deinit(it), rcu_read_unlock(), 0); \ > > > (it)->i++) > > > > That is nicer, even better to write it with some inlines.. > > You mean pass a callback to an inline function that would iterate? no, just wrap some of that logic embedded in the for statement in some inlines, not sure Jason
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c index 468fdd0d8713..0fa3a229d90e 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c @@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ struct path_it { (it)->i < (it)->clt->paths_num; \ (it)->i++) -#define while_each_path(it) \ +#define end_each_path(it) \ path_it_deinit(it); \ rcu_read_unlock(); \ } @@ -1193,7 +1193,8 @@ static int rtrs_clt_failover_req(struct rtrs_clt *clt, /* Success path */ rtrs_clt_inc_failover_cnt(alive_sess->stats); break; - } while_each_path(&it); + } + end_each_path(&it); return err; } @@ -2887,7 +2888,8 @@ int rtrs_clt_request(int dir, struct rtrs_clt_req_ops *ops, } /* Success path */ break; - } while_each_path(&it); + } + end_each_path(&it); return err; }
Kbuild test robot reports a smatch warning: drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c:1196 rtrs_clt_failover_req() warn: inconsistent indenting drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c:2890 rtrs_clt_request() warn: inconsistent indenting To get rid of the warning, move the while_each_path() macro to a newline. Rename the macro to end_each_path() to avoid the "while should follow close brace '}'" checkpatch error. Fixes: 6a98d71daea1 ("RDMA/rtrs: client: main functionality") Signed-off-by: Danil Kipnis <danil.kipnis@cloud.ionos.com> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> --- v1->v2 Add fixes line drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)