| Message ID | 20210802092157.1260445-2-damien.lemoal@wdc.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | IO priority fixes and improvements | expand |
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 727955918563..1f38d75524ae 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -5293,7 +5293,7 @@ bfq_set_next_ioprio_data(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_io_cq *bic) if (bfqq->new_ioprio >= IOPRIO_BE_NR) { pr_crit("bfq_set_next_ioprio_data: new_ioprio %d\n", bfqq->new_ioprio); - bfqq->new_ioprio = IOPRIO_BE_NR; + bfqq->new_ioprio = IOPRIO_BE_NR - 1; } bfqq->entity.new_weight = bfq_ioprio_to_weight(bfqq->new_ioprio);
For a request that has a priority level equal to or larger than IOPRIO_BE_NR, bfq_set_next_ioprio_data() prints a critical warning but defaults to setting the request new_ioprio field to IOPRIO_BE_NR. This is not consistent with the warning and the allowed values for priority levels. Fix this by setting the request new_ioprio field to IOPRIO_BE_NR - 1, the lowest priority level allowed. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Fixes: aee69d78dec0 ("block, bfq: introduce the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler as an extra scheduler") Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com> --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)