From patchwork Mon Sep 19 16:16:47 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Coly Li X-Patchwork-Id: 12980716 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A9EC6FA86 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 16:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229797AbiISQRu (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2022 12:17:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45746 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229799AbiISQRr (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2022 12:17:47 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAAE83AB0B; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:17:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA69621AC2; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 16:17:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1663604260; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yavwVdcOwkRxq1Ojd2Q5m3eBvPT2tJIyu1OTolveTFg=; b=Id/6pHorgKV/uVLtSDuL6dNJbNYvLeDHqBhywBS5tKkRIvASI71aDhom3pbjo9ZlbUso33 YFxLZ9bowWDIbenZWMf6NvZ8oJOSbzaOmYYp7PaSJw8fUEWospbUaeBafMfc0j4fPYUXHG IX7MfvOfFDAxf4NH5/nBPN3kanZ1neI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1663604260; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yavwVdcOwkRxq1Ojd2Q5m3eBvPT2tJIyu1OTolveTFg=; b=QpPl8hDmepPD/m4FEGIjeV7ha0adbbyB5ysqmZUh+DyuE8cTfFWNUdpcihQ/CshDOK2Sl0 cSppWng/hMtfpuCA== Received: from localhost.localdomain (colyli.tcp.ovpn1.nue.suse.de [10.163.16.22]) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83DEE2C141; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 16:17:36 +0000 (UTC) From: Coly Li To: axboe@kernel.dk Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Coly Li , Mingzhe Zou Subject: [PATCH 5/5] bcache: fix set_at_max_writeback_rate() for multiple attached devices Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 00:16:47 +0800 Message-Id: <20220919161647.81238-6-colyli@suse.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.3 In-Reply-To: <20220919161647.81238-1-colyli@suse.de> References: <20220919161647.81238-1-colyli@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Inside set_at_max_writeback_rate() the calculation in following if() check is wrong, if (atomic_inc_return(&c->idle_counter) < atomic_read(&c->attached_dev_nr) * 6) Because each attached backing device has its own writeback thread running and increasing c->idle_counter, the counter increates much faster than expected. The correct calculation should be, (counter / dev_nr) < dev_nr * 6 which equals to, counter < dev_nr * dev_nr * 6 This patch fixes the above mistake with correct calculation, and helper routine idle_counter_exceeded() is added to make code be more clear. Reported-by: Mingzhe Zou Signed-off-by: Coly Li Acked-by: Mingzhe Zou --- drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c index 647661005176..c186bf55fe61 100644 --- a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c @@ -157,6 +157,53 @@ static void __update_writeback_rate(struct cached_dev *dc) dc->writeback_rate_target = target; } +static bool idle_counter_exceeded(struct cache_set *c) +{ + int counter, dev_nr; + + /* + * If c->idle_counter is overflow (idel for really long time), + * reset as 0 and not set maximum rate this time for code + * simplicity. + */ + counter = atomic_inc_return(&c->idle_counter); + if (counter <= 0) { + atomic_set(&c->idle_counter, 0); + return false; + } + + dev_nr = atomic_read(&c->attached_dev_nr); + if (dev_nr == 0) + return false; + + /* + * c->idle_counter is increased by writeback thread of all + * attached backing devices, in order to represent a rough + * time period, counter should be divided by dev_nr. + * Otherwise the idle time cannot be larger with more backing + * device attached. + * The following calculation equals to checking + * (counter / dev_nr) < (dev_nr * 6) + */ + if (counter < (dev_nr * dev_nr * 6)) + return false; + + return true; +} + +/* + * Idle_counter is increased every time when update_writeback_rate() is + * called. If all backing devices attached to the same cache set have + * identical dc->writeback_rate_update_seconds values, it is about 6 + * rounds of update_writeback_rate() on each backing device before + * c->at_max_writeback_rate is set to 1, and then max wrteback rate set + * to each dc->writeback_rate.rate. + * In order to avoid extra locking cost for counting exact dirty cached + * devices number, c->attached_dev_nr is used to calculate the idle + * throushold. It might be bigger if not all cached device are in write- + * back mode, but it still works well with limited extra rounds of + * update_writeback_rate(). + */ static bool set_at_max_writeback_rate(struct cache_set *c, struct cached_dev *dc) { @@ -167,21 +214,8 @@ static bool set_at_max_writeback_rate(struct cache_set *c, /* Don't set max writeback rate if gc is running */ if (!c->gc_mark_valid) return false; - /* - * Idle_counter is increased everytime when update_writeback_rate() is - * called. If all backing devices attached to the same cache set have - * identical dc->writeback_rate_update_seconds values, it is about 6 - * rounds of update_writeback_rate() on each backing device before - * c->at_max_writeback_rate is set to 1, and then max wrteback rate set - * to each dc->writeback_rate.rate. - * In order to avoid extra locking cost for counting exact dirty cached - * devices number, c->attached_dev_nr is used to calculate the idle - * throushold. It might be bigger if not all cached device are in write- - * back mode, but it still works well with limited extra rounds of - * update_writeback_rate(). - */ - if (atomic_inc_return(&c->idle_counter) < - atomic_read(&c->attached_dev_nr) * 6) + + if (!idle_counter_exceeded(c)) return false; if (atomic_read(&c->at_max_writeback_rate) != 1) @@ -195,13 +229,10 @@ static bool set_at_max_writeback_rate(struct cache_set *c, dc->writeback_rate_change = 0; /* - * Check c->idle_counter and c->at_max_writeback_rate agagain in case - * new I/O arrives during before set_at_max_writeback_rate() returns. - * Then the writeback rate is set to 1, and its new value should be - * decided via __update_writeback_rate(). + * In case new I/O arrives during before + * set_at_max_writeback_rate() returns. */ - if ((atomic_read(&c->idle_counter) < - atomic_read(&c->attached_dev_nr) * 6) || + if (!idle_counter_exceeded(c) || !atomic_read(&c->at_max_writeback_rate)) return false;