Message ID | 20230511014509.679482-4-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | blk-wbt: minor fix and cleanup | expand |
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 09:45:06AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote: > From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> > > Because rq_qos only make sense for rq based device. Instead of fail > from sysfs configuration, make wbt sysfs dentry invisible directly. This looks ok, bt I would be better to just have a separate attr group just for blk-mq based devices?
Hi, 在 2023/05/11 23:21, Christoph Hellwig 写道: > On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 09:45:06AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote: >> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> >> >> Because rq_qos only make sense for rq based device. Instead of fail >> from sysfs configuration, make wbt sysfs dentry invisible directly. > > This looks ok, bt I would be better to just have a separate attr > group just for blk-mq based devices? > Sounds good, I'll add a new attr_group that is only visible for rq based device, I think following attr can be moved to this new group: nr_requests, rq_affinity, scheduler, wbt_lat_usec Thanks, Kuai
diff --git a/block/blk-sysfs.c b/block/blk-sysfs.c index 6c1c4ba66bc0..c8e1f1462422 100644 --- a/block/blk-sysfs.c +++ b/block/blk-sysfs.c @@ -686,6 +686,10 @@ static umode_t queue_attr_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, !blk_queue_is_zoned(q)) return 0; +#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_WBT + if (attr == &queue_wb_lat_entry.attr && !queue_is_mq(q)) + return 0; +#endif return attr->mode; }