Message ID | 20230614002529.6636-1-ed.tsai@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v3] blk-mq: check on cpu id when there is only one ctx mapping | expand |
This looks fine to me: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > - if (rq->mq_hctx->nr_ctx == 1 || > + if ((rq->mq_hctx->nr_ctx == 1 && > + rq->mq_ctx->cpu == raw_smp_processor_id()) || > rq->cmd_flags & REQ_POLLED) But please fix the incorrct indentation in the existing code here please while you're at it (maybe Jens can just fold it in): if ((rq->mq_hctx->nr_ctx == 1 && rq->mq_ctx->cpu == raw_smp_processor_id()) || (rq->cmd_flags & REQ_POLLED))
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 08:25:29 +0800, Ed Tsai wrote: > commit f168420c62e7 ("blk-mq: don't redirect completion for hctx withs > only one ctx mapping") When nvme applies a 1:1 mapping of hctx and ctx, > there will be no remote request. > > But for ufs, the submission and completion queues could be asymmetric. > (e.g. Multiple SQs share one CQ) Therefore, 1:1 mapping of hctx and > ctx won't complete request on the submission cpu. In this situation, > this nr_ctx check could violate the QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_FORCE, as a result, > check on cpu id when there is only one ctx mapping. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] blk-mq: check on cpu id when there is only one ctx mapping commit: 30654614f3d27230200b1650f6025a2ce67900b4 Best regards,
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c index 41f7e2b500bd..ecc30ebe9483 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq.c +++ b/block/blk-mq.c @@ -1176,7 +1176,8 @@ bool blk_mq_complete_request_remote(struct request *rq) * or a polled request, always complete locally, * it's pointless to redirect the completion. */ - if (rq->mq_hctx->nr_ctx == 1 || + if ((rq->mq_hctx->nr_ctx == 1 && + rq->mq_ctx->cpu == raw_smp_processor_id()) || rq->cmd_flags & REQ_POLLED) return false;