@@ -95,8 +95,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__blkdev_issue_discard);
* Description:
* Issue a discard request for the sectors in question.
*/
-int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
- sector_t nr_sects, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned long flags)
+static int do_blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
+ sector_t nr_sects, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned long flags,
+ bool ignore_nosupport)
{
int type = REQ_WRITE | REQ_DISCARD;
struct bio *bio = NULL;
@@ -111,13 +112,20 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
&bio);
if (!ret && bio) {
ret = submit_bio_wait(type, bio);
- if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
+ if (ignore_nosupport && ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
ret = 0;
}
blk_finish_plug(&plug);
return ret;
}
+
+int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
+ sector_t nr_sects, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned long flags)
+{
+ return do_blkdev_issue_discard(bdev, sector, nr_sects, gfp_mask,
+ flags, true);
+}
I'd prefer to do the EOPNOTSUPP mapping for the ioctl here instead of in
the do_blkdev_issue_discard() function. Then you don't need the
>>>>> "Shaohua" == Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> writes: Shaohua> blkdev_issue_zeroout try discard/writesame first, if they fail, Shaohua> zeroout fallback to regular write. The problem is Shaohua> discard/writesame doesn't return error for -EOPNOTSUPP, then Shaohua> zeroout can't do fallback and leave disk data not Shaohua> changed. zeroout should have guaranteed zero-fill behavior. As discussed at LSF/MM, let's explicitly separate the exported/ioctl() functions from the __/do_foo_bar iterators. That's essentially what you have done. And then put all error handling and policy in the ioctl() wrappers instead of the worker functions. ignore_nosupport flag. EXPORT_SYMBOL(blkdev_issue_discard); /** @@ -131,9 +139,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blkdev_issue_discard); * Description: * Issue a write same request for the sectors in question. */ -int blkdev_issue_write_same(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, +static int do_blkdev_issue_write_same(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, sector_t nr_sects, gfp_t gfp_mask, - struct page *page) + struct page *page, bool ignore_nosupport) { struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev); unsigned int max_write_same_sectors; @@ -167,7 +175,15 @@ int blkdev_issue_write_same(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, if (bio) ret = submit_bio_wait(REQ_WRITE | REQ_WRITE_SAME, bio); - return ret != -EOPNOTSUPP ? ret : 0; + return (ret != -EOPNOTSUPP || !ignore_nosupport) ? ret : 0; +} + +int blkdev_issue_write_same(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, + sector_t nr_sects, gfp_t gfp_mask, + struct page *page) +{ + return do_blkdev_issue_write_same(bdev, sector, nr_sects, gfp_mask, + page, true); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(blkdev_issue_write_same); There should not be a "soft" fail for WRITE SAME, it's not a hint. @@ -238,12 +254,13 @@ int blkdev_issue_zeroout(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev); if (discard && blk_queue_discard(q) && q->limits.discard_zeroes_data && - blkdev_issue_discard(bdev, sector, nr_sects, gfp_mask, 0) == 0) + do_blkdev_issue_discard(bdev, sector, nr_sects, gfp_mask, 0, + false) == 0) return 0; if (bdev_write_same(bdev) && - blkdev_issue_write_same(bdev, sector, nr_sects, gfp_mask, - ZERO_PAGE(0)) == 0) + do_blkdev_issue_write_same(bdev, sector, nr_sects, gfp_mask, + ZERO_PAGE(0), false) == 0) return 0; return __blkdev_issue_zeroout(bdev, sector, nr_sects, gfp_mask);