Message ID | 20181115085306.9910-1-ming.lei@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <linux-btrfs-owner@kernel.org> Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1E214D6 for <patchwork-linux-btrfs@patchwork.kernel.org>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 08:53:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D64A28496 for <patchwork-linux-btrfs@patchwork.kernel.org>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 08:53:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 8155628505; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 08:53:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC017284ED for <patchwork-linux-btrfs@patchwork.kernel.org>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 08:53:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728904AbeKOTA2 (ORCPT <rfc822;patchwork-linux-btrfs@patchwork.kernel.org>); Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:00:28 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46554 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728564AbeKOTA2 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:00:28 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54E2C300157B; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 08:53:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-8-23.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.8.23]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E184608FA; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 08:53:20 +0000 (UTC) From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>, Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>, dm-devel@redhat.com, Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, "Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, Boaz Harrosh <ooo@electrozaur.com>, Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>, cluster-devel@redhat.com Subject: [PATCH V10 00/19] block: support multi-page bvec Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 16:52:47 +0800 Message-Id: <20181115085306.9910-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.46]); Thu, 15 Nov 2018 08:53:34 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP |
Series |
block: support multi-page bvec
|
expand
|
It seems like bi_phys_segments is still around of this series. Shouldn't it be superflous now?
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 03:03:14PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > It seems like bi_phys_segments is still around of this series. > Shouldn't it be superflous now? Even though multi-page bvec is supported, the segment number doesn't equal to the actual bvec count yet, for example, one bvec may be too bigger to be held in one single segment. Thanks, Ming