@@ -3507,7 +3507,6 @@ struct extent_buffer *btrfs_clone_extent_buffer(const struct extent_buffer *src)
for (int i = 0; i < num_folios; i++) {
struct folio *folio = new->folios[i];
- int ret;
ret = attach_extent_buffer_folio(new, folio, NULL);
if (ret < 0) {
@@ -4587,8 +4586,7 @@ static void assert_eb_folio_uptodate(const struct extent_buffer *eb, int i)
return;
if (fs_info->nodesize < PAGE_SIZE) {
- struct folio *folio = eb->folios[0];
-
+ folio = eb->folios[0];
ASSERT(i == 0);
if (WARN_ON(!btrfs_subpage_test_uptodate(fs_info, folio,
eb->start, eb->len)))
@@ -1617,10 +1617,8 @@ static noinline void submit_compressed_extents(struct btrfs_work *work, bool do_
u64 alloc_hint = 0;
if (do_free) {
- struct async_chunk *async_chunk;
struct async_cow *async_cow;
- async_chunk = container_of(work, struct async_chunk, work);
btrfs_add_delayed_iput(async_chunk->inode);
if (async_chunk->blkcg_css)
css_put(async_chunk->blkcg_css);
When running 'make W=2' there are a few reports where a variable of the same name is declared in a nested block. In all the cases we can use the one declared in the parent block, no problematic cases were found. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> --- fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 4 +--- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 -- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)