[v4] btrfs: properly handle overlapping areas in memmove_extent_buffer

Commit Message

Sergei Trofimovich April 11, 2011, 9:52 p.m. UTC

Fix data corruption caused by memcpy() usage on overlapping data.
I've observed it first when found out usermode linux crash on btrfs.

?all chain is the following:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at /home/slyfox/linux-2.6/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3900 memcpy_extent_buffer+0x1a5/0x219()
Call Trace:
6fa39a58:  [<601b495e>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x18/0x1c
6fa39a68:  [<60029ad9>] warn_slowpath_common+0x59/0x70
6fa39aa8:  [<60029b05>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x17
6fa39ab8:  [<600efc97>] memcpy_extent_buffer+0x1a5/0x219
6fa39b48:  [<600efd9f>] memmove_extent_buffer+0x94/0x208
6fa39bc8:  [<600becbf>] btrfs_del_items+0x214/0x473
6fa39c78:  [<600ce1b0>] btrfs_delete_one_dir_name+0x7c/0xda
6fa39cc8:  [<600dad6b>] __btrfs_unlink_inode+0xad/0x25d
6fa39d08:  [<600d7864>] btrfs_start_transaction+0xe/0x10
6fa39d48:  [<600dc9ff>] btrfs_unlink_inode+0x1b/0x3b
6fa39d78:  [<600e04bc>] btrfs_unlink+0x70/0xef
6fa39dc8:  [<6007f0d0>] vfs_unlink+0x58/0xa3
6fa39df8:  [<60080278>] do_unlinkat+0xd4/0x162
6fa39e48:  [<600517db>] call_rcu_sched+0xe/0x10
6fa39e58:  [<600452a8>] __put_cred+0x58/0x5a
6fa39e78:  [<6007446c>] sys_faccessat+0x154/0x166
6fa39ed8:  [<60080317>] sys_unlink+0x11/0x13
6fa39ee8:  [<60016b80>] handle_syscall+0x58/0x70
6fa39f08:  [<60021377>] userspace+0x2d4/0x381
6fa39fc8:  [<60014507>] fork_handler+0x62/0x69
---[ end trace 70b0ca2ef0266b93 ]---

http://www.mail-archive.com/[e-mail]/msg09302.html

Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich <[e-mail]>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <[e-mail]>
---
Changes since v3:
- Added Josef's Reviewed-by

Changes since v2:
- Code style cleanup
- 2 versions of patch: BUG_ON and WARN_ON variants,
   _but_ see below why I prefer BUG_ON

Changes since v1:
 
   else
   src_kaddr = dst_kaddr;

 +BUG_ON(abs(src_off - dst_off)<  len);
   memcpy(dst_kaddr + dst_off, src_kaddr + src_off, len);  

Too eager BUG_ON. Now used only for src_page == dst_page.
 
 -if (dst_offset<  src_offset) {
 +if (abs(dst_offset - src_offset)>= len) {  

abs() is not a good thing to use un unsigned values. aded helper overlapping_areas.

 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c |   14 +++++++++++---
 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Patch

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index 20ddb28..10db989 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -3885,6 +3885,12 @@  static void move_pages(struct page *dst_page, struct page *src_page,
 	kunmap_atomic(dst_kaddr, KM_USER0);
 }
 
+static inline bool areas_overlap(unsigned long src, unsigned long dst, unsigned long len)
+{
+	unsigned long distance = (src > dst) ? src - dst : dst - src;
+	return distance < len;
+}
+
 static void copy_pages(struct page *dst_page, struct page *src_page,
 		       unsigned long dst_off, unsigned long src_off,
 		       unsigned long len)
@@ -3892,10 +3898,12 @@  static void copy_pages(struct page *dst_page, struct page *src_page,
 	char *dst_kaddr = kmap_atomic(dst_page, KM_USER0);
 	char *src_kaddr;
 
-	if (dst_page != src_page)
+	if (dst_page != src_page) {
 		src_kaddr = kmap_atomic(src_page, KM_USER1);
-	else
+	} else {
 		src_kaddr = dst_kaddr;
+		BUG_ON(areas_overlap(src_off, dst_off, len));
+	}
 
 	memcpy(dst_kaddr + dst_off, src_kaddr + src_off, len);
 	kunmap_atomic(dst_kaddr, KM_USER0);
@@ -3970,7 +3978,7 @@  void memmove_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer *dst, unsigned long dst_offset,
 		       "len %lu len %lu\n", dst_offset, len, dst->len);
 		BUG_ON(1);
 	}
-	if (dst_offset < src_offset) {
+	if (!areas_overlap(src_offset, dst_offset, len)) {
 		memcpy_extent_buffer(dst, dst_offset, src_offset, len);
 		return;
 	}