Message ID | 1312205910-13053-1-git-send-email-apw@canonical.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 08/01/2011 09:38 AM, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > When we mount a btrfs filesystem from read-only media there will be no > read/write devices; for example mounting an SD card with its lock enabled. > This triggers an immediate BUG during mount: > > kernel BUG at .../fs/btrfs/super.c:984! > > This is triggered by statfs when calculating the free space in the > filesytem. We bug if the number of read/write devices is 0. > > This check seems spurious as the information collected is valid regardless > of whether the devices are read-only or not. As the count is used to > size the sort array it seems more correct to switch it to the number of > open devices. > > BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816770 > Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com> Acked-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Thanks, Josef -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c index 15634d4..ae4367a 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c @@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ static int btrfs_calc_avail_data_space(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 *free_bytes) int i = 0, nr_devices; int ret; - nr_devices = fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices; + nr_devices = fs_info->fs_devices->open_devices; BUG_ON(!nr_devices); devices_info = kmalloc(sizeof(*devices_info) * nr_devices,
When we mount a btrfs filesystem from read-only media there will be no read/write devices; for example mounting an SD card with its lock enabled. This triggers an immediate BUG during mount: kernel BUG at .../fs/btrfs/super.c:984! This is triggered by statfs when calculating the free space in the filesytem. We bug if the number of read/write devices is 0. This check seems spurious as the information collected is valid regardless of whether the devices are read-only or not. As the count is used to size the sort array it seems more correct to switch it to the number of open devices. BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816770 Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com> --- fs/btrfs/super.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)