@@ -2550,7 +2550,6 @@ int extent_write_full_page(struct extent_io_tree *tree, struct page *page,
struct writeback_control *wbc)
{
int ret;
- struct address_space *mapping = page->mapping;
struct extent_page_data epd = {
.bio = NULL,
.tree = tree,
@@ -2558,17 +2557,9 @@ int extent_write_full_page(struct extent_io_tree *tree, struct page *page,
.extent_locked = 0,
.sync_io = wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL,
};
- struct writeback_control wbc_writepages = {
- .sync_mode = wbc->sync_mode,
- .nr_to_write = 64,
- .range_start = page_offset(page) + PAGE_CACHE_SIZE,
- .range_end = (loff_t)-1,
- };
ret = __extent_writepage(page, wbc, &epd);
- extent_write_cache_pages(tree, mapping, &wbc_writepages,
- __extent_writepage, &epd, flush_write_bio);
flush_epd_write_bio(&epd);
return ret;
}
When doing a writepage we call writepages to try and write out any other dirty pages in the area. This could cause problems where we commit a transaction and then have somebody else dirtying metadata in the area as we could end up writing out a lot more than we care about, which could cause latency on anybody who is waiting for the transaction to completely finish committing. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> --- fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 9 --------- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)