Message ID | 1352119329-18716-1-git-send-email-bo.li.liu@oracle.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 08:42:08PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote: > When committing a transaction, we may bail out of running delayed refs > due to ENOSPC, and then abort the current transaction to flip into readonly. > > But we'll hit a deadlock on ref head's lock since we forget to release > its lock and other cleanup stuff. Miao sent a patch for this on Tue, 08 May 2012 http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg16361.html and it does more things than just the unlock, I can't tell which one of the patches is the right one, only letting you know. david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 03:19:49PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 08:42:08PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote: > > When committing a transaction, we may bail out of running delayed refs > > due to ENOSPC, and then abort the current transaction to flip into readonly. > > > > But we'll hit a deadlock on ref head's lock since we forget to release > > its lock and other cleanup stuff. > > Miao sent a patch for this on Tue, 08 May 2012 > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg16361.html > > and it does more things than just the unlock, I can't tell which one of > the patches is the right one, only letting you know. > Thanks for pointing that, David. Yes, that patch will work. Miao, can you send it here again? [PATCH] Btrfs: fix deadlock when the process of delayed refs fails thanks, liubo > david > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:58:55 +0800, Liu Bo wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 03:19:49PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 08:42:08PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote: >>> When committing a transaction, we may bail out of running delayed refs >>> due to ENOSPC, and then abort the current transaction to flip into readonly. >>> >>> But we'll hit a deadlock on ref head's lock since we forget to release >>> its lock and other cleanup stuff. >> >> Miao sent a patch for this on Tue, 08 May 2012 >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg16361.html >> >> and it does more things than just the unlock, I can't tell which one of >> the patches is the right one, only letting you know. >> > > Thanks for pointing that, David. Yes, that patch will work. > > Miao, can you send it here again? > [PATCH] Btrfs: fix deadlock when the process of delayed refs fails OK, I will send it out again. Thanks Miao > > thanks, > liubo > > >> david >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index 3d3e2c1..e0c4809 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -2314,6 +2314,9 @@ static noinline int run_clustered_refs(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, kfree(extent_op); if (ret) { + list_del_init(&locked_ref->cluster); + mutex_unlock(&locked_ref->mutex); + printk(KERN_DEBUG "btrfs: run_delayed_extent_op returned %d\n", ret); spin_lock(&delayed_refs->lock); return ret; @@ -2356,6 +2359,10 @@ static noinline int run_clustered_refs(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, count++; if (ret) { + if (locked_ref) { + list_del_init(&locked_ref->cluster); + mutex_unlock(&locked_ref->mutex); + } printk(KERN_DEBUG "btrfs: run_one_delayed_ref returned %d\n", ret); spin_lock(&delayed_refs->lock); return ret;
When committing a transaction, we may bail out of running delayed refs due to ENOSPC, and then abort the current transaction to flip into readonly. But we'll hit a deadlock on ref head's lock since we forget to release its lock and other cleanup stuff. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 7 +++++++ 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)