From patchwork Mon Jan 7 22:06:42 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Josef Bacik X-Patchwork-Id: 1942741 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-btrfs@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-process-083081@patchwork2.kernel.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by patchwork2.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3E5DF230 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 22:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754409Ab3AGWAJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2013 17:00:09 -0500 Received: from mx2.fusionio.com ([66.114.96.31]:46076 "EHLO mx2.fusionio.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753212Ab3AGWAI (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2013 17:00:08 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1357596007-0421b52b81d9bd0001-6jHSXT Received: from mail1.int.fusionio.com (mail1.int.fusionio.com [10.101.1.21]) by mx2.fusionio.com with ESMTP id fye1cDLhYNMfFn3C (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 15:00:07 -0700 (MST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: JBacik@fusionio.com Received: from localhost (98.26.82.158) by mail.fusionio.com (10.101.1.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.83.0; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 15:00:06 -0700 From: Josef Bacik To: Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: add orphan before truncating pagecache Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 17:06:42 -0500 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: [PATCH] Btrfs: add orphan before truncating pagecache Message-ID: <1357596402-11499-1-git-send-email-jbacik@fusionio.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.7.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: mail1.int.fusionio.com[10.101.1.21] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1357596007 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES128-SHA X-Barracuda-URL: http://10.101.1.181:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at fusionio.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.119214 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Running xfstests 83 in a loop would sometimes fail the fsck. This happens because if we invalidate a page that already has an ordered extent setup for it we will complete the ordered extent ourselves, assuming that the truncate will clean everything up. The problem with this is there is plenty of time for the truncate to fail after we've done this work. So to fix this we need to add the orphan item first to make sure the cleanup gets done properly, and then we can truncate the pagecache and all that stuff and be safe. This fixes the btrfsck failures I was seeing while running 83 in a loop. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index d3ce93e..20138b6 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -2484,6 +2484,18 @@ int btrfs_orphan_cleanup(struct btrfs_root *root) continue; } nr_truncate++; + + /* 1 for the orphan item deletion. */ + trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 1); + if (IS_ERR(trans)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(trans); + goto out; + } + ret = btrfs_orphan_add(trans, inode); + btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root); + if (ret) + goto out; + ret = btrfs_truncate(inode); } else { nr_unlink++; @@ -3789,6 +3801,29 @@ static int btrfs_setsize(struct inode *inode, loff_t newsize) set_bit(BTRFS_INODE_ORDERED_DATA_CLOSE, &BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags); + /* + * 1 for the orphan item we're going to add + * 1 for the orphan item deletion. + */ + trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 2); + if (IS_ERR(trans)) + return PTR_ERR(trans); + + /* + * We need to do this in case we fail at _any_ point during the + * actual truncate. Once we do the truncate_setsize we could + * invalidate pages which forces any outstanding ordered io to + * be instantly completed which will give us extents that need + * to be truncated. If we fail to get an orphan inode down we + * could have left over extents that were never meant to live, + * so we need to garuntee from this point on that everything + * will be consistent. + */ + ret = btrfs_orphan_add(trans, inode); + btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root); + if (ret) + return ret; + /* we don't support swapfiles, so vmtruncate shouldn't fail */ truncate_setsize(inode, newsize); ret = btrfs_truncate(inode); @@ -6939,11 +6974,9 @@ static int btrfs_truncate(struct inode *inode) /* * 1 for the truncate slack space - * 1 for the orphan item we're going to add - * 1 for the orphan item deletion * 1 for updating the inode. */ - trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 4); + trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 2); if (IS_ERR(trans)) { err = PTR_ERR(trans); goto out; @@ -6954,12 +6987,6 @@ static int btrfs_truncate(struct inode *inode) min_size); BUG_ON(ret); - ret = btrfs_orphan_add(trans, inode); - if (ret) { - btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root); - goto out; - } - /* * setattr is responsible for setting the ordered_data_close flag, * but that is only tested during the last file release. That