Message ID | 1385530408-28858-1-git-send-email-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Under Review, archived |
Headers | show |
Sorry for the wrong patch version. It is just a normal bug fix, V4 is wrong and not necessary. Qu On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:33:28 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > When using "-U" option with btrfs-corrupt-block, it will cause a > segfault due to a missing break in getopt switch. > > Reported-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > btrfs-corrupt-block.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/btrfs-corrupt-block.c b/btrfs-corrupt-block.c > index f0c14a9..a2828d4 100644 > --- a/btrfs-corrupt-block.c > +++ b/btrfs-corrupt-block.c > @@ -758,6 +758,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av) > break; > case 'U': > chunk_tree = 1; > + break; > case 'i': > inode = atoll(optarg); > if (inode == 0) {
diff --git a/btrfs-corrupt-block.c b/btrfs-corrupt-block.c index f0c14a9..a2828d4 100644 --- a/btrfs-corrupt-block.c +++ b/btrfs-corrupt-block.c @@ -758,6 +758,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av) break; case 'U': chunk_tree = 1; + break; case 'i': inode = atoll(optarg); if (inode == 0) {
When using "-U" option with btrfs-corrupt-block, it will cause a segfault due to a missing break in getopt switch. Reported-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> --- btrfs-corrupt-block.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)