@@ -1295,9 +1295,9 @@ out:
return ret;
}
-static const char const *unit_suffix_binary[] =
+static const char* unit_suffix_binary[] =
{ "B", "KiB", "MiB", "GiB", "TiB", "PiB", "EiB"};
-static const char const *unit_suffix_decimal[] =
+static const char* unit_suffix_decimal[] =
{ "B", "KB", "MB", "GB", "TB", "PB", "EB"};
int pretty_size_snprintf(u64 size, char *str, size_t str_size, int unit_mode)
@@ -1305,7 +1305,7 @@ int pretty_size_snprintf(u64 size, char *str, size_t str_size, int unit_mode)
int num_divs;
float fraction;
int base = 0;
- const char const **suffix = NULL;
+ const char** suffix = NULL;
u64 last_size;
if (str_size == 0)
'const int const *x' means the same thing as 'const int *x' or 'int const *x'; the intent was probably 'const int * const x'. However, this won't work for the 'suffix' variable, as it has to be assigned, and making the static tables into const pointers to const chars leads to a mismatch there. This was found with clang's duplicate-decl-specifier warning. Signed-off-by: Adam Buchbinder <abuchbinder@google.com> --- utils.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)