@@ -32,6 +32,12 @@
#define BITS_PER_BITMAP (PAGE_CACHE_SIZE * 8)
#define MAX_CACHE_BYTES_PER_GIG (32 * 1024)
+struct btrfs_trim_range {
+ u64 start;
+ u64 bytes;
+ struct list_head list;
+};
+
static int link_free_space(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl,
struct btrfs_free_space *info);
static void unlink_free_space(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl,
@@ -882,6 +888,7 @@ int write_cache_extent_entries(struct io_ctl *io_ctl,
int ret;
struct btrfs_free_cluster *cluster = NULL;
struct rb_node *node = rb_first(&ctl->free_space_offset);
+ struct btrfs_trim_range *trim_entry;
/* Get the cluster for this block_group if it exists */
if (block_group && !list_empty(&block_group->cluster_list)) {
@@ -917,6 +924,21 @@ int write_cache_extent_entries(struct io_ctl *io_ctl,
cluster = NULL;
}
}
+
+ /*
+ * Make sure we don't miss any range that was removed from our rbtree
+ * because trimming is running. Otherwise after a umount+mount (or crash
+ * after committing the transaction) we would leak free space and get
+ * an inconsistent free space cache report from fsck.
+ */
+ list_for_each_entry(trim_entry, &ctl->trimming_ranges, list) {
+ ret = io_ctl_add_entry(io_ctl, trim_entry->start,
+ trim_entry->bytes, NULL);
+ if (ret)
+ goto fail;
+ *entries += 1;
+ }
+
return 0;
fail:
return -ENOSPC;
@@ -1136,12 +1158,15 @@ static int __btrfs_write_out_cache(struct btrfs_root *root, struct inode *inode,
io_ctl_set_generation(&io_ctl, trans->transid);
+ mutex_lock(&ctl->cache_writeout_mutex);
/* Write out the extent entries in the free space cache */
ret = write_cache_extent_entries(&io_ctl, ctl,
block_group, &entries, &bitmaps,
&bitmap_list);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret) {
+ mutex_unlock(&ctl->cache_writeout_mutex);
goto out_nospc;
+ }
/*
* Some spaces that are freed in the current transaction are pinned,
@@ -1149,11 +1174,18 @@ static int __btrfs_write_out_cache(struct btrfs_root *root, struct inode *inode,
* committed, we shouldn't lose them.
*/
ret = write_pinned_extent_entries(root, block_group, &io_ctl, &entries);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret) {
+ mutex_unlock(&ctl->cache_writeout_mutex);
goto out_nospc;
+ }
- /* At last, we write out all the bitmaps. */
+ /*
+ * At last, we write out all the bitmaps and keep cache_writeout_mutex
+ * locked while doing it because a concurrent trim can be manipulating
+ * or freeing the bitmap.
+ */
ret = write_bitmap_entries(&io_ctl, &bitmap_list);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctl->cache_writeout_mutex);
if (ret)
goto out_nospc;
@@ -2296,6 +2328,8 @@ void btrfs_init_free_space_ctl(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group)
ctl->start = block_group->key.objectid;
ctl->private = block_group;
ctl->op = &free_space_op;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctl->trimming_ranges);
+ mutex_init(&ctl->cache_writeout_mutex);
/*
* we only want to have 32k of ram per block group for keeping
@@ -2912,10 +2946,12 @@ void btrfs_init_free_cluster(struct btrfs_free_cluster *cluster)
static int do_trimming(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group,
u64 *total_trimmed, u64 start, u64 bytes,
- u64 reserved_start, u64 reserved_bytes)
+ u64 reserved_start, u64 reserved_bytes,
+ struct btrfs_trim_range *trim_entry)
{
struct btrfs_space_info *space_info = block_group->space_info;
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = block_group->fs_info;
+ struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl = block_group->free_space_ctl;
int ret;
int update = 0;
u64 trimmed = 0;
@@ -2935,7 +2971,10 @@ static int do_trimming(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group,
if (!ret)
*total_trimmed += trimmed;
+ mutex_lock(&ctl->cache_writeout_mutex);
btrfs_add_free_space(block_group, reserved_start, reserved_bytes);
+ list_del(&trim_entry->list);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctl->cache_writeout_mutex);
if (update) {
spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
@@ -2963,16 +3002,21 @@ static int trim_no_bitmap(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group,
u64 bytes;
while (start < end) {
+ struct btrfs_trim_range trim_entry;
+
+ mutex_lock(&ctl->cache_writeout_mutex);
spin_lock(&ctl->tree_lock);
if (ctl->free_space < minlen) {
spin_unlock(&ctl->tree_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctl->cache_writeout_mutex);
break;
}
entry = tree_search_offset(ctl, start, 0, 1);
if (!entry) {
spin_unlock(&ctl->tree_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctl->cache_writeout_mutex);
break;
}
@@ -2981,6 +3025,7 @@ static int trim_no_bitmap(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group,
node = rb_next(&entry->offset_index);
if (!node) {
spin_unlock(&ctl->tree_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctl->cache_writeout_mutex);
goto out;
}
entry = rb_entry(node, struct btrfs_free_space,
@@ -2989,6 +3034,7 @@ static int trim_no_bitmap(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group,
if (entry->offset >= end) {
spin_unlock(&ctl->tree_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctl->cache_writeout_mutex);
break;
}
@@ -2998,6 +3044,7 @@ static int trim_no_bitmap(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group,
bytes = min(extent_start + extent_bytes, end) - start;
if (bytes < minlen) {
spin_unlock(&ctl->tree_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctl->cache_writeout_mutex);
goto next;
}
@@ -3005,9 +3052,13 @@ static int trim_no_bitmap(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group,
kmem_cache_free(btrfs_free_space_cachep, entry);
spin_unlock(&ctl->tree_lock);
+ trim_entry.start = extent_start;
+ trim_entry.bytes = extent_bytes;
+ list_add_tail(&trim_entry.list, &ctl->trimming_ranges);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctl->cache_writeout_mutex);
ret = do_trimming(block_group, total_trimmed, start, bytes,
- extent_start, extent_bytes);
+ extent_start, extent_bytes, &trim_entry);
if (ret)
break;
next:
@@ -3036,17 +3087,21 @@ static int trim_bitmaps(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group,
while (offset < end) {
bool next_bitmap = false;
+ struct btrfs_trim_range trim_entry;
+ mutex_lock(&ctl->cache_writeout_mutex);
spin_lock(&ctl->tree_lock);
if (ctl->free_space < minlen) {
spin_unlock(&ctl->tree_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctl->cache_writeout_mutex);
break;
}
entry = tree_search_offset(ctl, offset, 1, 0);
if (!entry) {
spin_unlock(&ctl->tree_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctl->cache_writeout_mutex);
next_bitmap = true;
goto next;
}
@@ -3055,6 +3110,7 @@ static int trim_bitmaps(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group,
ret2 = search_bitmap(ctl, entry, &start, &bytes);
if (ret2 || start >= end) {
spin_unlock(&ctl->tree_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctl->cache_writeout_mutex);
next_bitmap = true;
goto next;
}
@@ -3062,6 +3118,7 @@ static int trim_bitmaps(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group,
bytes = min(bytes, end - start);
if (bytes < minlen) {
spin_unlock(&ctl->tree_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctl->cache_writeout_mutex);
goto next;
}
@@ -3070,9 +3127,13 @@ static int trim_bitmaps(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group,
free_bitmap(ctl, entry);
spin_unlock(&ctl->tree_lock);
+ trim_entry.start = start;
+ trim_entry.bytes = bytes;
+ list_add_tail(&trim_entry.list, &ctl->trimming_ranges);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctl->cache_writeout_mutex);
ret = do_trimming(block_group, total_trimmed, start, bytes,
- start, bytes);
+ start, bytes, &trim_entry);
if (ret)
break;
next:
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ struct btrfs_free_space_ctl {
u64 start;
struct btrfs_free_space_op *op;
void *private;
+ struct mutex cache_writeout_mutex;
+ struct list_head trimming_ranges;
};
struct btrfs_free_space_op {
@@ -364,6 +364,8 @@ void btrfs_init_free_ino_ctl(struct btrfs_root *root)
ctl->start = 0;
ctl->private = NULL;
ctl->op = &free_ino_op;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctl->trimming_ranges);
+ mutex_init(&ctl->cache_writeout_mutex);
/*
* Initially we allow to use 16K of ram to cache chunks of
Trimming is completely transactionless, and the way it operates consists of hiding free space entries from a block group, perform the trim/discard and then make the free space entries visible again. Therefore while a free space entry is being trimmed, we can have free space cache writing running in parallel (as part of a transaction commit) which will miss the free space entry. This means that an unmount (or crash/reboot) after that transaction commit and mount again before another transaction starts/commits after the discard finishes, we will have some free space that won't be used again unless the free space cache is rebuilt. After the unmount, fsck (btrfsck, btrfs check) reports the issue like the following example: *** fsck.btrfs output *** checking extents checking free space cache There is no free space entry for 521764864-521781248 There is no free space entry for 521764864-1103101952 cache appears valid but isnt 29360128 Checking filesystem on /dev/sdc UUID: b4789e27-4774-4626-98e9-ae8dfbfb0fb5 found 1235681286 bytes used err is -22 (...) Another issue caused by this race is a crash while writing bitmap entries to the cache, because while the cache writeout task accesses the bitmaps, the trim task can be concurrently modifying the bitmap or worse might be freeing the bitmap. The later case results in the following crash: [55650.804460] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC [55650.804835] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_flakey dm_mod crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd fscache sunrpc loop parport_pc parport i2c_piix4 psmouse evdev pcspkr microcode processor i2ccore serio_raw thermal_sys button ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sg sd_mod crc_t10dif sr_mod cdrom crct10dif_generic crct10dif_common ata_generic virtio_scsi floppy ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio scsi_mod e1000 [last unloaded: btrfs] [55650.806169] CPU: 1 PID: 31002 Comm: btrfs-transacti Tainted: G W 3.17.0-rc5-btrfs-next-1+ #1 [55650.806493] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.7.5-0-ge51488c-20140602_164612-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014 [55650.806867] task: ffff8800b12f6410 ti: ffff880071538000 task.ti: ffff880071538000 [55650.807166] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa037cf45>] [<ffffffffa037cf45>] write_bitmap_entries+0x65/0xbb [btrfs] [55650.807514] RSP: 0018:ffff88007153bc30 EFLAGS: 00010246 [55650.807687] RAX: 000000005d1ec000 RBX: ffff8800a665df08 RCX: 0000000000000400 [55650.807885] RDX: ffff88005d1ec000 RSI: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RDI: ffff88005d1ec000 [55650.808017] RBP: ffff88007153bc58 R08: 00000000ddd51536 R09: 00000000000001e0 [55650.808017] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000037 R12: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b [55650.808017] R13: ffff88007153bca8 R14: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b R15: ffff88007153bc98 [55650.808017] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88023ec80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [55650.808017] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b [55650.808017] CR2: 0000000002273b88 CR3: 00000000b18f6000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [55650.808017] Stack: [55650.808017] ffff88020e834e00 ffff880172d68db0 0000000000000000 ffff88019257c800 [55650.808017] ffff8801d42ea720 ffff88007153bd10 ffffffffa037d2fa ffff880224e99180 [55650.808017] ffff8801469a6188 ffff880224e99140 ffff880172d68c50 00000003000000b7 [55650.808017] Call Trace: [55650.808017] [<ffffffffa037d2fa>] __btrfs_write_out_cache+0x1ea/0x37f [btrfs] [55650.808017] [<ffffffffa037d959>] btrfs_write_out_cache+0xa1/0xd8 [btrfs] [55650.808017] [<ffffffffa033936b>] btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x4b5/0x505 [btrfs] [55650.808017] [<ffffffffa03aa98e>] commit_cowonly_roots+0x15e/0x1f7 [btrfs] [55650.808017] [<ffffffff813eb9c7>] ? _raw_spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [55650.808017] [<ffffffffa0346e46>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x411/0x882 [btrfs] [55650.808017] [<ffffffffa03432a4>] transaction_kthread+0xf2/0x1a4 [btrfs] [55650.808017] [<ffffffffa03431b2>] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x3d8/0x3d8 [btrfs] [55650.808017] [<ffffffff8105966b>] kthread+0xb7/0xbf [55650.808017] [<ffffffff810595b4>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x67/0x67 [55650.808017] [<ffffffff813ebeac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [55650.808017] [<ffffffff810595b4>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x67/0x67 [55650.808017] Code: 4c 89 ef 8d 70 ff e8 d4 fc ff ff 41 8b 45 34 41 39 45 30 7d 5c 31 f6 4c 89 ef e8 80 f6 ff ff 49 8b 7d 00 4c 89 f6 b9 00 04 00 00 <f3> a5 4c 89 ef 41 8b 45 30 8d 70 ff e8 a3 fc ff ff 41 8b 45 34 [55650.808017] RIP [<ffffffffa037cf45>] write_bitmap_entries+0x65/0xbb [btrfs] [55650.808017] RSP <ffff88007153bc30> [55650.815725] ---[ end trace 1c032e96b149ff86 ]--- Fix this by serializing both tasks in such a way that cache writeout doesn't wait for the trim/discard of free space entries to finish and doesn't miss any free space entry. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> --- V2: Enlonged the critical section to include the cache writeout of bitmaps, since I ran into this recently. The issue is that a concurrent trim can modify or free the bitmaps while the cache writeout task is using them. Updated commit message with crash trace example. fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.h | 2 ++ fs/btrfs/inode-map.c | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)