Message ID | 1421277703-32154-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@suse.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show |
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:21:43PM +0000, Filipe Manana wrote: > Currently this test fails on 2 situations: > > 1) The scratch device supports trim/discard. In this case any modern > version of mkfs.btrfs outputs a message (to stderr) informing that > a trim is performed, which the golden output doesn't expect: > > btrfs/017 - output mismatch (see /git/xfstests/results//btrfs/017.out.bad) > --- tests/btrfs/017.out 2015-01-06 11:14:22.730143144 +0000 > +++ /git/xfstests/results//btrfs/017.out.bad 2015-01-14 22:33:01.582195719 +0000 > @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ > QA output created by 017 > +Performing full device TRIM (100.00GiB) ... > wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 0 > XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec) > 4096 4096 > ... > (Run 'diff -u tests/btrfs/017.out /git/xfstests/results//btrfs/017.out.bad' to see the entire diff) > > So like others tests do, just redirect mkfs' standard error. > > 2) On platforms with a page size greater than 4Kb. At the moment btrfs > doesn't support a node/leaf size smaller than the page size, but it > supports a larger one. So use the max supported node size (64Kb) so > that the test runs on any platform currently supported by Linux. > > Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/tests/btrfs/017 b/tests/btrfs/017 index 7937607..d00d7c8 100755 --- a/tests/btrfs/017 +++ b/tests/btrfs/017 @@ -56,7 +56,11 @@ _require_cloner rm -f $seqres.full -_scratch_mkfs "--nodesize 4096" +# Currently in btrfs the node/leaf size can not be smaller than the page +# size (but it can be greater than the page size). So use the largest +# supported node/leaf size (64Kb) so that the test can run on any platform +# that Linux supports. +_scratch_mkfs "--nodesize 65536" >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount $XFS_IO_PROG -f -d -c "pwrite 0 8K" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io diff --git a/tests/btrfs/017.out b/tests/btrfs/017.out index 7658e2e..f940f3a 100644 --- a/tests/btrfs/017.out +++ b/tests/btrfs/017.out @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ QA output created by 017 wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 0 XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec) -4096 4096 -4096 4096 +65536 65536 +65536 65536
Currently this test fails on 2 situations: 1) The scratch device supports trim/discard. In this case any modern version of mkfs.btrfs outputs a message (to stderr) informing that a trim is performed, which the golden output doesn't expect: btrfs/017 - output mismatch (see /git/xfstests/results//btrfs/017.out.bad) --- tests/btrfs/017.out 2015-01-06 11:14:22.730143144 +0000 +++ /git/xfstests/results//btrfs/017.out.bad 2015-01-14 22:33:01.582195719 +0000 @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ QA output created by 017 +Performing full device TRIM (100.00GiB) ... wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 0 XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec) 4096 4096 ... (Run 'diff -u tests/btrfs/017.out /git/xfstests/results//btrfs/017.out.bad' to see the entire diff) So like others tests do, just redirect mkfs' standard error. 2) On platforms with a page size greater than 4Kb. At the moment btrfs doesn't support a node/leaf size smaller than the page size, but it supports a larger one. So use the max supported node size (64Kb) so that the test runs on any platform currently supported by Linux. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> --- tests/btrfs/017 | 6 +++++- tests/btrfs/017.out | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)