@@ -1645,14 +1645,14 @@ int btrfs_realloc_node(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
parent_nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(parent);
blocksize = root->nodesize;
- end_slot = parent_nritems;
+ end_slot = parent_nritems - 1;
- if (parent_nritems == 1)
+ if (parent_nritems <= 1)
return 0;
btrfs_set_lock_blocking(parent);
- for (i = start_slot; i < end_slot; i++) {
+ for (i = start_slot; i <= end_slot; i++) {
int close = 1;
btrfs_node_key(parent, &disk_key, i);
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ int btrfs_realloc_node(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
other = btrfs_node_blockptr(parent, i - 1);
close = close_blocks(blocknr, other, blocksize);
}
- if (!close && i < end_slot - 2) {
+ if (!close && i < end_slot) {
other = btrfs_node_blockptr(parent, i + 1);
close = close_blocks(blocknr, other, blocksize);
}
The end_slot variable actually matches the number of pointers in the node and not the last slot (which is 'nritems - 1'). Therefore in order to check that the current slot in the for loop doesn't match the last one, the correct logic is to check if 'i' is less than 'end_slot - 1' and not 'end_slot - 2'. Fix this and set end_slot to be 'nritems - 1', as it's less confusing since the variable name implies it's inclusive rather then exclusive. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> --- fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)