From patchwork Mon Jan 23 09:13:50 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Qu Wenruo X-Patchwork-Id: 9531951 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590366042F for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 09:16:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0BA27CF3 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 09:16:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 42FB92833A; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 09:16:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B880D27CF3 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 09:16:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750906AbdAWJQc (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2017 04:16:32 -0500 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([59.151.112.132]:11543 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750711AbdAWJPJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2017 04:15:09 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,518,1449504000"; d="scan'208";a="15006276" Received: from unknown (HELO cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 23 Jan 2017 17:14:17 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXCHPEKD01.g08.fujitsu.local (unknown [10.167.33.80]) by cn.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101BB47B1510; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:14:16 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.167.226.34) by G08CNEXCHPEKD01.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:14:20 +0800 From: Qu Wenruo To: CC: , , Subject: [PATCH 1/9] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: Fix wrong block group check when search slot points to slot beyong leaf Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:13:50 +0800 Message-ID: <20170123091359.21390-2-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0 In-Reply-To: <20170123091359.21390-1-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <20170123091359.21390-1-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.167.226.34] X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: 101BB47B1510.AB5BE X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Since btrfs_search_slot() can points to the slot which is beyond the leaves' capacity, in the following case, btrfs lowmem mode check will skip the block group and report false alert: leaf 29405184 items 37 free space 1273 generation 11 owner 2 ... item 36 key (77594624 EXTENT_ITEM 2097152) extent refs 1 gen 8 flags DATA extent data backref root 5 objectid 265 offset 0 count 1 leaf 29409280 items 43 free space 670 generation 11 owner 2 item 0 key (96468992 EXTENT_ITEM 2097152) extent refs 1 gen 8 flags DATA extent data backref root 5 objectid 274 offset 0 count 1 item 1 key (96468992 BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM 33554432) block group used 2265088 chunk_objectid 256 flags DATA When checking block group item, we will search key(96468992 0 0) to start from the first item in the block group. While search_slot() will point to leaf 29405184, slot 37 which is beyond leaf capacity. And when reading key from slot 37, uninitialized data can be read out and cause us to exit block group item check, leading to false alert. Fix it by checking path.slot[0] before reading out the key. Reported-by: Christoph Anton Mitterer Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo --- cmds-check.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/cmds-check.c b/cmds-check.c index 1dba2985..c39392b7 100644 --- a/cmds-check.c +++ b/cmds-check.c @@ -10961,6 +10961,11 @@ static int check_block_group_item(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, /* Iterate extent tree to account used space */ while (1) { leaf = path.nodes[0]; + + /* Search slot can point to the last item beyond leaf nritems */ + if (path.slots[0] >= btrfs_header_nritems(leaf)) + goto next; + btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &extent_key, path.slots[0]); if (extent_key.objectid >= bg_key.objectid + bg_key.offset) break;